2004 U.S. Landfalling Storms


2004 U.S. Landfalling Storms


Figure 2 displays the U.S. landfalling storms for the 2004 hurricane season as of September 30.



Figure 2: Tropical cyclones making US landfall (TS Bonnie, Category 4 Hurricane Charley, Category 2 Hurricane Frances, TS Gaston, TS Hermine, Category 3 Hurricane Ivan and Category 3 Hurricane Jeanne). Alex did not technically make U.S. landfall but did effect the Outer Banks with hurricane-force winds. A solid line denotes a tropical cyclone of hurricane intensity, and a dashed line indicates a tropical cyclone of tropical storm intensity.


Hurricane Alex brushed the Outer Banks of North Carolina on August 3 as a Category 2 hurricane while traveling northeastward across the Atlantic. Wind gusts to hurricane force were reported on Cape Hatteras. Damage estimates from Alex are approximately 2.5 million dollars. No deaths were reported.



Tropical Storm Bonnie made landfall near Apalachicola, Florida on August 12 with an estimated intensity at landfall of 50 miles per hour. Bonnie was responsible for three deaths in North Carolina from tornadoes spawned from the weakening system. Damage from this system was minimal.



Hurricane Charley made its initial United States landfall on August 13 near Punta Gorda, Florida as a Category 4 hurricane with estimated winds of 145 miles per hour. Charley then traversed northeast through the center of the state, severely affecting Orlando and Daytona Beach before reaching the Atlantic Ocean. Charley made three additional landfalls: first at Cape Romain, SC with estimated winds of 80 miles per hour, a second landfall near Myrtle Beach with estimated winds of 75 miles per hour, and a final landfall on Long Island, NY as a minimal tropical storm with estimated winds of 40 miles per hour. Preliminary damage estimates for this system are between 13-15 billion dollars. Charley is the second most expensive hurricane to hit the United States, behind only Hurricane Andrew of 1992.



Hurricane Frances made landfall as a Category 2 hurricane near Sewall’s Point, Florida on September 5 with maximum winds estimated at 105 miles per hour. Frances slowly tracked west-northwest across the state before emerging into the Gulf of Mexico. Frances made a second landfall as a 65 mph tropical storm near St. Marks, Florida on September 6. Insured damage from Frances is estimated at around 4 billion dollars, bringing the total damage estimate to around 8 billion dollars. Frances was responsible for at least 24 deaths.



Tropical Storm Gaston made landfall near McLellanville, SC with maximum winds estimated at 70 miles per hour. Preliminary damage estimates for South Carolina from Gaston are 15 million dollars. No fatalities have been attributed to Gaston.



Tropical Storm Hermine made landfall as a minimal tropical storm near New Bedford, MA with maximum winds estimated at 40 miles per hour. No damage estimates are available, and no loss of life was reported from this system.



Hurricane Ivan made landfall near Palm Shores, AL as a Category 3 hurricane with maximum winds at landfall estimated at 130 miles per hour. Extensive destruction occurred in Pensacola and its suburbs. Ivan was responsible for death and destruction along the entire East Coast of the United States with over 50 deaths attributed to the system in the United States. The remnants of Ivan later tracked southwestward over the Atlantic Ocean, across the state of Florida, and then back into the Gulf of Mexico. Once in the Gulf, the system regenerated and made a second landfall in Cameron Parish, LA as a minimal tropical storm with maximum winds estimated at 40 miles per hour. Initial estimates of insured damage losses from Ivan range from 3-6 billion dollars, bringing the total damage estimate to between 6-12 billion dollars.



Hurricane Jeanne made landfall late on September 25 on the southern part of Hutchinson Island, Florida as a Category 3 hurricane with maximum sustained winds estimated at 120 miles per hour. Jeanne was the fourth hurricane to affect the state of Florida in a span of six weeks. Nine deaths have been reported in the United States from this hurricane, and initial estimates of insured damage range from 4-8 billion dollars according to Risk Management Solutions. This puts estimated total damage between 8-16 billion dollars. In addition, Jeanne was responsible for between 1500-2000 deaths along the northern coast of Haiti.


2004 U.S. Landfalling Storms


Figure 2 displays the U.S. landfalling storms for the 2004 hurricane season as of September 30.



Figure 2: Tropical cyclones making US landfall (TS Bonnie, Category 4 Hurricane Charley, Category 2 Hurricane Frances, TS Gaston, TS Hermine, Category 3 Hurricane Ivan and Category 3 Hurricane Jeanne). Alex did not technically make U.S. landfall but did effect the Outer Banks with hurricane-force winds. A solid line denotes a tropical cyclone of hurricane intensity, and a dashed line indicates a tropical cyclone of tropical storm intensity.


Hurricane Alex brushed the Outer Banks of North Carolina on August 3 as a Category 2 hurricane while traveling northeastward across the Atlantic. Wind gusts to hurricane force were reported on Cape Hatteras. Damage estimates from Alex are approximately 2.5 million dollars. No deaths were reported.



Tropical Storm Bonnie made landfall near Apalachicola, Florida on August 12 with an estimated intensity at landfall of 50 miles per hour. Bonnie was responsible for three deaths in North Carolina from tornadoes spawned from the weakening system. Damage from this system was minimal.



Hurricane Charley made its initial United States landfall on August 13 near Punta Gorda, Florida as a Category 4 hurricane with estimated winds of 145 miles per hour. Charley then traversed northeast through the center of the state, severely affecting Orlando and Daytona Beach before reaching the Atlantic Ocean. Charley made three additional landfalls: first at Cape Romain, SC with estimated winds of 80 miles per hour, a second landfall near Myrtle Beach with estimated winds of 75 miles per hour, and a final landfall on Long Island, NY as a minimal tropical storm with estimated winds of 40 miles per hour. Preliminary damage estimates for this system are between 13-15 billion dollars. Charley is the second most expensive hurricane to hit the United States, behind only Hurricane Andrew of 1992.



Hurricane Frances made landfall as a Category 2 hurricane near Sewall’s Point, Florida on September 5 with maximum winds estimated at 105 miles per hour. Frances slowly tracked west-northwest across the state before emerging into the Gulf of Mexico. Frances made a second landfall as a 65 mph tropical storm near St. Marks, Florida on September 6. Insured damage from Frances is estimated at around 4 billion dollars, bringing the total damage estimate to around 8 billion dollars. Frances was responsible for at least 24 deaths.



Tropical Storm Gaston made landfall near McLellanville, SC with maximum winds estimated at 70 miles per hour. Preliminary damage estimates for South Carolina from Gaston are 15 million dollars. No fatalities have been attributed to Gaston.



Tropical Storm Hermine made landfall as a minimal tropical storm near New Bedford, MA with maximum winds estimated at 40 miles per hour. No damage estimates are available, and no loss of life was reported from this system.



Hurricane Ivan made landfall near Palm Shores, AL as a Category 3 hurricane with maximum winds at landfall estimated at 130 miles per hour. Extensive destruction occurred in Pensacola and its suburbs. Ivan was responsible for death and destruction along the entire East Coast of the United States with over 50 deaths attributed to the system in the United States. The remnants of Ivan later tracked southwestward over the Atlantic Ocean, across the state of Florida, and then back into the Gulf of Mexico. Once in the Gulf, the system regenerated and made a second landfall in Cameron Parish, LA as a minimal tropical storm with maximum winds estimated at 40 miles per hour. Initial estimates of insured damage losses from Ivan range from 3-6 billion dollars, bringing the total damage estimate to between 6-12 billion dollars.



Hurricane Jeanne made landfall late on September 25 on the southern part of Hutchinson Island, Florida as a Category 3 hurricane with maximum sustained winds estimated at 120 miles per hour. Jeanne was the fourth hurricane to affect the state of Florida in a span of six weeks. Nine deaths have been reported in the United States from this hurricane, and initial estimates of insured damage range from 4-8 billion dollars according to Risk Management Solutions. This puts estimated total damage between 8-16 billion dollars. In addition, Jeanne was responsible for between 1500-2000 deaths along the northern coast of Haiti.

Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading