2005 SEAFOOD HARVEST FIGURES RELEASED MOREHEAD CITY – Continuing a trend that began in 1997, the state’s commercial fishing harvest continues to drop, while recreational fishing remains stable, according to harvest data released by the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries. The 2005 commercial harvest of finfish and shellfish totaled 79 million pounds, valued at $64.9 million – North Carolina’s smallest harvest on record. Data suggests other southeast states are experiencing similar declines. Landings fluctuate for a variety of reasons – weather, fuel prices, market demand, availability of seafood, low-cost imports, the number of people fishing and harvest restrictions. Each of these factors came into play during North Carolina’s 2005 fishing year. One reason the depressed 2005 landings was the small menhaden catch; only 13.3 million pounds of the oily industrial fish were landed at Tar Heel docks. Landings in this fishery can fluctuate widely, from the low of 13.3 million pounds, to over 300 million pounds, depending on the amount of effort the commercial industry expends. That effort was minimal in 2005 with only 15 fishing trips reported using purse seines, the principal gear used to take menhaden. Other commercial mainstays experiencing decreased landings were blue crabs and shrimp. Blue crab harvest was at 25.6 million pounds, compared to the previous five-year average of 36 million pounds. Shrimp landings were 2.3 million pounds, down from the previous five-year average of 7.3 million pounds. Trip data show fewer crab pot and shrimp trawl fishing trips were made in 2005. The higher cost of fuel, the lower market value of shrimp due to imports, and the scarcity of crabs and shrimp, all contributed to the landings decline in these important fisheries. The top-five species commercially harvested were: Blue Crabs (Hard) $20.3 million Blue Crabs (Hard) 25.4 million The state’s oyster harvest continues to be a highlight to the commercial sector. In 2005, watermen caught 71,479 bushels, an increase over the 69,501 bushels harvested in 2004, and well over the previous five-year average of 50,431 bushels. This modest gain in oyster harvest is most likely attributed to favorable growing conditions, including higher levels of rainfall than in previous years. Compared to the previous five-year average, other increased commercial landings in 2005 were gag grouper, grunts, king mackerel, porgies, beeliners, red drum, swordfish and bigeye tuna. Commercial Effort Summary: Year Active Fishermen Pounds Harvested Fishing Trips On the recreational front, the number of estimated anglers increased to 2.4 million in 2005, with most growth coming from out-of-state fishermen. Yellowfin tuna topped the charts for poundage of fish landed, followed by dolphin. There were minimal declines in the number of fishing trips and harvest compared to the previous year, which could possibly be attributed to fuel costs. The top-five fish recreationally harvested were: Recreational Effort Summary: Year Active Anglers Pounds Harvested Fishing Trips 2005 SEAFOOD HARVEST FIGURES RELEASED MOREHEAD CITY – Continuing a trend that began in 1997, the state’s commercial fishing harvest continues to drop, while recreational fishing remains stable, according to harvest data released by the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries. The 2005 commercial harvest of finfish and shellfish totaled 79 million pounds, valued at $64.9 million – North Carolina’s smallest harvest on record. Data suggests other southeast states are experiencing similar declines. Landings fluctuate for a variety of reasons – weather, fuel prices, market demand, availability of seafood, low-cost imports, the number of people fishing and harvest restrictions. Each of these factors came into play during North Carolina’s 2005 fishing year. One reason the depressed 2005 landings was the small menhaden catch; only 13.3 million pounds of the oily industrial fish were landed at Tar Heel docks. Landings in this fishery can fluctuate widely, from the low of 13.3 million pounds, to over 300 million pounds, depending on the amount of effort the commercial industry expends. That effort was minimal in 2005 with only 15 fishing trips reported using purse seines, the principal gear used to take menhaden. Other commercial mainstays experiencing decreased landings were blue crabs and shrimp. Blue crab harvest was at 25.6 million pounds, compared to the previous five-year average of 36 million pounds. Shrimp landings were 2.3 million pounds, down from the previous five-year average of 7.3 million pounds. Trip data show fewer crab pot and shrimp trawl fishing trips were made in 2005. The higher cost of fuel, the lower market value of shrimp due to imports, and the scarcity of crabs and shrimp, all contributed to the landings decline in these important fisheries. The top-five species commercially harvested were: Blue Crabs (Hard) $20.3 million Blue Crabs (Hard) 25.4 million The state’s oyster harvest continues to be a highlight to the commercial sector. In 2005, watermen caught 71,479 bushels, an increase over the 69,501 bushels harvested in 2004, and well over the previous five-year average of 50,431 bushels. This modest gain in oyster harvest is most likely attributed to favorable growing conditions, including higher levels of rainfall than in previous years. Compared to the previous five-year average, other increased commercial landings in 2005 were gag grouper, grunts, king mackerel, porgies, beeliners, red drum, swordfish and bigeye tuna. Commercial Effort Summary: Year Active Fishermen Pounds Harvested Fishing Trips On the recreational front, the number of estimated anglers increased to 2.4 million in 2005, with most growth coming from out-of-state fishermen. Yellowfin tuna topped the charts for poundage of fish landed, followed by dolphin. There were minimal declines in the number of fishing trips and harvest compared to the previous year, which could possibly be attributed to fuel costs. The top-five fish recreationally harvested were: Recreational Effort Summary: Year Active Anglers Pounds Harvested Fishing Trips
Commercial Harvest Declines Persist
By Value* By Pounds Landed
Summer Flounder $7.5 million Atlantic Menhaden 13.3 million
Shrimp $4.4 million Atlantic Croaker 11.5 million
Southern Flounder $3.5 million Summer Flounder 4 million
Atlantic Croaker $3.3 million Bluefish 2.8 million
*Values are ex-vessel, which is the amount fishermen are paid for their catch.
2000 5,031 154,229,116 259,746
2001 5,076 137,163,960 246,914
2002 4,694 160,171,058 213,513
2003 4,352 139,425,054 197,314
2004 4,255 134,102,127 185,627
2005 3,890 79,162,659 155,112
Species Pounds
Yellowfin Tuna 5.5 million
Dolphin 5.1 million
Striped Bass 2.2 million
King Mackerel 1.3 million
Bluefish 1.1 million
2000 1,921,780 22,699,280 6,460,011
2001 2,006,661 24,145,835 6,649,546
2002 1,765,205 17,879,149 5,586,122
2003 2,102,925 22,009,304 6,733,464
2004 2,055,415 24,905,130 7,024,464
2005 2,360,712 22,077,462 6,653,357
The estimated harvest from people who hold the Recreational Commercial Gear License was 517,533 pounds in 2005, with a slight decline in the number of RCGL trips from 53,518 in 2004 to 46,935 in 2005. The RCGL allows recreational fishermen to use limited amounts of commercial gear to harvest seafood for personal consumption.
The top-five species harvested by RCGL gear:
Species Pounds
Spot 193,769
Blue Crab 105,179
Flounder 58,099
Striped Mullet 36,314
Shrimp 32,542
Commercial Harvest Declines Persist
By Value* By Pounds Landed
Summer Flounder $7.5 million Atlantic Menhaden 13.3 million
Shrimp $4.4 million Atlantic Croaker 11.5 million
Southern Flounder $3.5 million Summer Flounder 4 million
Atlantic Croaker $3.3 million Bluefish 2.8 million
*Values are ex-vessel, which is the amount fishermen are paid for their catch.
2000 5,031 154,229,116 259,746
2001 5,076 137,163,960 246,914
2002 4,694 160,171,058 213,513
2003 4,352 139,425,054 197,314
2004 4,255 134,102,127 185,627
2005 3,890 79,162,659 155,112
Species Pounds
Yellowfin Tuna 5.5 million
Dolphin 5.1 million
Striped Bass 2.2 million
King Mackerel 1.3 million
Bluefish 1.1 million
2000 1,921,780 22,699,280 6,460,011
2001 2,006,661 24,145,835 6,649,546
2002 1,765,205 17,879,149 5,586,122
2003 2,102,925 22,009,304 6,733,464
2004 2,055,415 24,905,130 7,024,464
2005 2,360,712 22,077,462 6,653,357
The estimated harvest from people who hold the Recreational Commercial Gear License was 517,533 pounds in 2005, with a slight decline in the number of RCGL trips from 53,518 in 2004 to 46,935 in 2005. The RCGL allows recreational fishermen to use limited amounts of commercial gear to harvest seafood for personal consumption.
The top-five species harvested by RCGL gear:
Species Pounds
Spot 193,769
Blue Crab 105,179
Flounder 58,099
Striped Mullet 36,314
Shrimp 32,542
2005 SEAFOOD HARVEST FIGURES RELEASED
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
Keep Reading
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (315)
- February 2024 (550)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (6)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (8)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (11)
- September 2017 (8)
- August 2017 (17)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (36)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (20)
- June 2016 (17)
- May 2016 (24)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (33)
- February 2016 (37)
- January 2016 (84)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (6)
- January 2014 (5)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (9)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (8)
- September 2012 (15)
- August 2012 (16)
- July 2012 (15)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (7)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (14)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (5)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (40)
- March 2008 (30)
- February 2008 (19)
- January 2008 (53)
- December 2007 (15)
- November 2007 (27)
- October 2007 (16)
- September 2007 (28)
- August 2007 (21)
- July 2007 (25)
- June 2007 (28)
- May 2007 (52)
- April 2007 (28)
- March 2007 (38)
- February 2007 (36)
- January 2007 (25)
- December 2006 (50)
- November 2006 (48)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (20)
- August 2006 (36)
- July 2006 (50)
- June 2006 (74)
- May 2006 (70)
- April 2006 (87)
- March 2006 (139)
- February 2006 (94)
- January 2006 (100)
- December 2005 (99)
- November 2005 (70)
- October 2005 (65)
- September 2005 (43)
- August 2005 (41)
- July 2005 (68)
- June 2005 (68)
- May 2005 (52)
- April 2005 (76)
- March 2005 (104)
- February 2005 (97)
- January 2005 (75)
- December 2004 (90)
- November 2004 (67)
- October 2004 (77)
- September 2004 (44)
- August 2004 (66)
- July 2004 (66)
- June 2004 (68)
- May 2004 (87)
- April 2004 (93)
- March 2004 (99)
- February 2004 (101)
- January 2004 (72)
- December 2003 (20)
- November 2003 (11)