Request that NMFS immediately extend the Winter Bluefin Fishery January 16, 2006 Dear Bill: The average live weight of all bluefin tuna landed continues to remain high. In the last two weeks some of our fish dressed over 400 lb, with most dressing over 300 lb. These data continue to show that our Winter fishery this year does not pose a threat to “small” bluefin as rumored and speculated by certain interest groups. This lack of “small” bluefin mortality, which we presume certain interest groups are referring to as fish between 73 and 81 inches curved fork length, further demonstrates the need to let our fishery develop without restriction until the actual catch data show a clear threat to the quota or size class. We continue to catch true “Giant” class bluefin tuna with only a few “shorts” mixed in and those are released alive. Our market prices continue to be good, with most fish selling for more than $10 per pound at the dock. As stated in our last letter, there is clearly no possible threat to the 545 metric ton bluefin tuna quota. Consequently, there is no need for RFDs in January or any other phase of this season. We continue to believe that a combination of no RFDs and an increase in the daily retention limit to three fish per day is immediately necessary to assure US rod and reel tuna fishermen of “reasonable opportunity” to catch even a small portion of our bluefin tuna quota, the full amount of which is provided for in the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Further, we once again request that NMFS immediately extend the Winter Bluefin Fishery to the end of February to achieve two positive results – new scientific data collection and reasonable opportunity to catch our quota. A February fishery would not get into the bluefin spawning time period and it could be accomplished via experimental fishery permits to all rod and reel General Category and Charter/Headboat permit holders. With giant bluefin tuna now being sighted, lost, and occasionally caught by recreational anglers in previously unfished areas near the South Carolina and Virginia borders, with Barbara Block’s Tag-A-Giant (TAG) fleet having only had time to catch and/or receive a handful of bluefin tuna from the Morehead City area, and with very limited scientific data on winter bluefin tuna outside of the Hatteras/Morehead City areas and December/January timeframe, an experimental February fishery would offer new, previously unavailable data collection opportunities that are important in helping define the population structure, migratory patterns, and feeding patterns of the widely traveled yet elusive bluefin tuna. Fishermen are scheduled to fish today out of Southport, NC and surrounding areas near Cape Fear, and if catches are good, a portion of the fleet currently located in the Morehead City area would likely move down to that new, experimental area after this next front and gale force wind period passes. Even with a February fishery with fishermen spanning much of the NC coast between Cape Fear and Cape Hatteras, it’s unlikely that this entire Winter fishery will result in more than 150 metric tons of bluefin caught, thereby posing no threat to the overall 545 ton quota. The large remaining quota offers an unprecedented opportunity to expand our winter data set and experience with bluefin tuna without any possible threat to the quota. Please note that we did not receive a response from NMFS to our January 3, 2006 letter or phone calls regarding our request for consideration of an experimental February season and 3 fish per day catch rate. I will call you again today to discuss your position on this important matter. We would also like to meet with you in person at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter should that be necessary to help resolve this. Sincerely, Pete Manuel Executive Director Request that NMFS immediately extend the Winter Bluefin Fishery January 16, 2006 Dear Bill: The average live weight of all bluefin tuna landed continues to remain high. In the last two weeks some of our fish dressed over 400 lb, with most dressing over 300 lb. These data continue to show that our Winter fishery this year does not pose a threat to “small” bluefin as rumored and speculated by certain interest groups. This lack of “small” bluefin mortality, which we presume certain interest groups are referring to as fish between 73 and 81 inches curved fork length, further demonstrates the need to let our fishery develop without restriction until the actual catch data show a clear threat to the quota or size class. We continue to catch true “Giant” class bluefin tuna with only a few “shorts” mixed in and those are released alive. Our market prices continue to be good, with most fish selling for more than $10 per pound at the dock. As stated in our last letter, there is clearly no possible threat to the 545 metric ton bluefin tuna quota. Consequently, there is no need for RFDs in January or any other phase of this season. We continue to believe that a combination of no RFDs and an increase in the daily retention limit to three fish per day is immediately necessary to assure US rod and reel tuna fishermen of “reasonable opportunity” to catch even a small portion of our bluefin tuna quota, the full amount of which is provided for in the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Further, we once again request that NMFS immediately extend the Winter Bluefin Fishery to the end of February to achieve two positive results – new scientific data collection and reasonable opportunity to catch our quota. A February fishery would not get into the bluefin spawning time period and it could be accomplished via experimental fishery permits to all rod and reel General Category and Charter/Headboat permit holders. With giant bluefin tuna now being sighted, lost, and occasionally caught by recreational anglers in previously unfished areas near the South Carolina and Virginia borders, with Barbara Block’s Tag-A-Giant (TAG) fleet having only had time to catch and/or receive a handful of bluefin tuna from the Morehead City area, and with very limited scientific data on winter bluefin tuna outside of the Hatteras/Morehead City areas and December/January timeframe, an experimental February fishery would offer new, previously unavailable data collection opportunities that are important in helping define the population structure, migratory patterns, and feeding patterns of the widely traveled yet elusive bluefin tuna. Fishermen are scheduled to fish today out of Southport, NC and surrounding areas near Cape Fear, and if catches are good, a portion of the fleet currently located in the Morehead City area would likely move down to that new, experimental area after this next front and gale force wind period passes. Even with a February fishery with fishermen spanning much of the NC coast between Cape Fear and Cape Hatteras, it’s unlikely that this entire Winter fishery will result in more than 150 metric tons of bluefin caught, thereby posing no threat to the overall 545 ton quota. The large remaining quota offers an unprecedented opportunity to expand our winter data set and experience with bluefin tuna without any possible threat to the quota. Please note that we did not receive a response from NMFS to our January 3, 2006 letter or phone calls regarding our request for consideration of an experimental February season and 3 fish per day catch rate. I will call you again today to discuss your position on this important matter. We would also like to meet with you in person at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter should that be necessary to help resolve this. Sincerely, Pete Manuel Executive Director
Dr. Bill Hogarth>br>Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries Service
1315 East West Highway, Room 14555
Silver Spring, MD 20910
(sent via fax and mail)
We appreciate the previous NMFS action to lift the RFDs for the past two weekends. Unfortunately the combination of gale force winds, limited fishing effort (primarily out of the Morehead City area), and a widely spread bluefin tuna population (sightings and catches from near the VA border to the SC border) has led to less than 10 metric tons being caught in the last 2 weeks. With about 2 weeks remaining in our scheduled fishery, there is still about 470 metric tons of quota to be caught. At this rate our fishery will close on January 31 with 460 tons of uncaught quota, not including the 200 tons NMFS moved from our General Category quota to the Reserve Category at the beginning of the Winter fishery to account for potential over-harvests in other categories.
Dr. Bill Hogarth>br>Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries Service
1315 East West Highway, Room 14555
Silver Spring, MD 20910
(sent via fax and mail)
We appreciate the previous NMFS action to lift the RFDs for the past two weekends. Unfortunately the combination of gale force winds, limited fishing effort (primarily out of the Morehead City area), and a widely spread bluefin tuna population (sightings and catches from near the VA border to the SC border) has led to less than 10 metric tons being caught in the last 2 weeks. With about 2 weeks remaining in our scheduled fishery, there is still about 470 metric tons of quota to be caught. At this rate our fishery will close on January 31 with 460 tons of uncaught quota, not including the 200 tons NMFS moved from our General Category quota to the Reserve Category at the beginning of the Winter fishery to account for potential over-harvests in other categories.
Request that NMFS immediately extend the Winter Bluefin Fishery
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
Keep Reading
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (315)
- February 2024 (550)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (6)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (8)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (11)
- September 2017 (8)
- August 2017 (17)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (36)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (20)
- June 2016 (17)
- May 2016 (24)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (33)
- February 2016 (37)
- January 2016 (84)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (6)
- January 2014 (5)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (9)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (8)
- September 2012 (15)
- August 2012 (16)
- July 2012 (15)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (7)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (14)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (5)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (40)
- March 2008 (30)
- February 2008 (19)
- January 2008 (53)
- December 2007 (15)
- November 2007 (27)
- October 2007 (16)
- September 2007 (28)
- August 2007 (21)
- July 2007 (25)
- June 2007 (28)
- May 2007 (52)
- April 2007 (28)
- March 2007 (38)
- February 2007 (36)
- January 2007 (25)
- December 2006 (50)
- November 2006 (48)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (20)
- August 2006 (36)
- July 2006 (50)
- June 2006 (74)
- May 2006 (70)
- April 2006 (87)
- March 2006 (139)
- February 2006 (94)
- January 2006 (100)
- December 2005 (99)
- November 2005 (70)
- October 2005 (65)
- September 2005 (43)
- August 2005 (41)
- July 2005 (68)
- June 2005 (68)
- May 2005 (52)
- April 2005 (76)
- March 2005 (104)
- February 2005 (97)
- January 2005 (75)
- December 2004 (90)
- November 2004 (67)
- October 2004 (77)
- September 2004 (44)
- August 2004 (66)
- July 2004 (66)
- June 2004 (68)
- May 2004 (87)
- April 2004 (93)
- March 2004 (99)
- February 2004 (101)
- January 2004 (72)
- December 2003 (20)
- November 2003 (11)