Council to Develop Controlled Access System for Mackerel

Council to Develop Controlled Access System for Mackerel
The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) met in Hampton, VA last week to review the status of Amendment 9 to its Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fishery Management Plan; comment on the National Marine Fisheries Service’ (NMFS) proposed rule regarding the incidental take of bottlenose dolphin and sea turtles; and hear fishing industry concerns regarding citizenship requirements for fishing vessel crews.


The Council voted to include in Amendment 9 a controlled access program for the mackerel fishery. The addition of this measure to Amendment 9 will require additional time to revise the current draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and draft public hearing document. It will also require the development of a scoping document and hearing schedule for a controlled access system. It is now anticipated that the Council will review and approve the Draft EIS and related public hearing document for the revised Amendment 9 during this year’s October Council meeting.



The consensus recommendations of the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Team regarding NMFS’ proposed rule to reduce the incidental mortality and injury of bottlenose dolphin, and reduce the incidental take of sea turtles by gillnets in North Carolina and Virginia state waters were supported by the Council with two exceptions. In lieu of the proposed rule, the Council supports exemptions for the use of large mesh gillnets with tiedowns in the area between 2 and 3 nautical miles from the shore between Cape Hatteras, North Carolina and the Virginia border, and the use of gillnets in the Commonwealth of Virginia’s oceanic black drum fishery. The Council also directed that a letter be sent to Dr. Bill Hogarth, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, regarding the enforcement of a Jones Act Provision (46 USC 8103(b)(1)) that requires 75 percent of the seamen on a fishing vessel be U.S. citizens and/or lawful permanent resident aliens. Fishing industry members expressed their concern that the U.S. labor pool for such workers is extremely limited, and a delay in its enforcement, or an exemption from the 75/25 rule, would minimize adverse economic impacts and sustain local community participation in affected fisheries. An exemption already exists for fishing vessels prosecuting highly migratory
species.



On Wednesday, January 19, the Special Investigation Unit of the Virginia Marine Resources Commission received the Council’s 2004 Fisheries Achievement Award for its outstanding professionalism and its efforts to protect living marine resources. Colonel Steven G. Bowman, on behalf of the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, accepted the award and graciously thanked the Council for its recognition of his Special Investigative Unit.
The Council’s Ecosystems Committee provided a forum for Dr. Mike Fogarty, Project Director for Ecosystem- Based Fishery Management, and Dr. Roger Locandro, Rutgers University, to present to the Council and the public information on ecosystem-based fishery management and historical perspectives thereof. The presentations were well received and will help frame the Council’s approach to future ecosystem-based management initiatives.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS CONTACT: Daniel T. Furlong
January 25, 2005 (302) 674-2331 x19
The Council’s Magnuson-Stevens Act Reauthorization Committee reviewed a number of suggested changes to the Act and selected a tentative list of proposed changes that Congress may wish to consider in its reauthorization deliberations. The Council will review and adopt these proposals at its next meeting.


At the request of the Council’s Executive Committee, the Council approved a motion to amend its Statement of Operation Practices and Procedures (SOPPs) to adopt, for the benefit of its staff, the alternative personnel management system for the US Department of Commerce (62 FRN 67434).
The Council and public also received presentations by George Darcy, Assistant Regional Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries, on NMFS’ regulatory “Front Loading” process, and Hannah Goodale, Senior Fishery Policy Analyst, on the status of the NMFS’ Northeast Regional Office’s draft bycatch reduction plan.

Council to Develop Controlled Access System for Mackerel
The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) met in Hampton, VA last week to review the status of Amendment 9 to its Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fishery Management Plan; comment on the National Marine Fisheries Service’ (NMFS) proposed rule regarding the incidental take of bottlenose dolphin and sea turtles; and hear fishing industry concerns regarding citizenship requirements for fishing vessel crews.


The Council voted to include in Amendment 9 a controlled access program for the mackerel fishery. The addition of this measure to Amendment 9 will require additional time to revise the current draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and draft public hearing document. It will also require the development of a scoping document and hearing schedule for a controlled access system. It is now anticipated that the Council will review and approve the Draft EIS and related public hearing document for the revised Amendment 9 during this year’s October Council meeting.



The consensus recommendations of the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Team regarding NMFS’ proposed rule to reduce the incidental mortality and injury of bottlenose dolphin, and reduce the incidental take of sea turtles by gillnets in North Carolina and Virginia state waters were supported by the Council with two exceptions. In lieu of the proposed rule, the Council supports exemptions for the use of large mesh gillnets with tiedowns in the area between 2 and 3 nautical miles from the shore between Cape Hatteras, North Carolina and the Virginia border, and the use of gillnets in the Commonwealth of Virginia’s oceanic black drum fishery. The Council also directed that a letter be sent to Dr. Bill Hogarth, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, regarding the enforcement of a Jones Act Provision (46 USC 8103(b)(1)) that requires 75 percent of the seamen on a fishing vessel be U.S. citizens and/or lawful permanent resident aliens. Fishing industry members expressed their concern that the U.S. labor pool for such workers is extremely limited, and a delay in its enforcement, or an exemption from the 75/25 rule, would minimize adverse economic impacts and sustain local community participation in affected fisheries. An exemption already exists for fishing vessels prosecuting highly migratory
species.



On Wednesday, January 19, the Special Investigation Unit of the Virginia Marine Resources Commission received the Council’s 2004 Fisheries Achievement Award for its outstanding professionalism and its efforts to protect living marine resources. Colonel Steven G. Bowman, on behalf of the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, accepted the award and graciously thanked the Council for its recognition of his Special Investigative Unit.
The Council’s Ecosystems Committee provided a forum for Dr. Mike Fogarty, Project Director for Ecosystem- Based Fishery Management, and Dr. Roger Locandro, Rutgers University, to present to the Council and the public information on ecosystem-based fishery management and historical perspectives thereof. The presentations were well received and will help frame the Council’s approach to future ecosystem-based management initiatives.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS CONTACT: Daniel T. Furlong
January 25, 2005 (302) 674-2331 x19
The Council’s Magnuson-Stevens Act Reauthorization Committee reviewed a number of suggested changes to the Act and selected a tentative list of proposed changes that Congress may wish to consider in its reauthorization deliberations. The Council will review and adopt these proposals at its next meeting.


At the request of the Council’s Executive Committee, the Council approved a motion to amend its Statement of Operation Practices and Procedures (SOPPs) to adopt, for the benefit of its staff, the alternative personnel management system for the US Department of Commerce (62 FRN 67434).
The Council and public also received presentations by George Darcy, Assistant Regional Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries, on NMFS’ regulatory “Front Loading” process, and Hannah Goodale, Senior Fishery Policy Analyst, on the status of the NMFS’ Northeast Regional Office’s draft bycatch reduction plan.

Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading