Council to Develop Framework to Allow Multi-State Recreational Harvest Limits fo


Council to Develop Framework to Allow Multi-State Recreational Harvest Limits for Summer Flounder


The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) met in Kill Devil Hills, NC last week and voted to initiate Framework 6 to its Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan (FMP). This framework is intended to be compatible with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s (ASMFC) Addendum XVII to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass FMP. If adopted, this action would allow both management authorities to divide recreational harvest limits for summer flounder into two or more subregions of the east coast (Maine through North Carolina) for the 2006 fishing year and thereafter. In addition, this Framework would also make available to states the voluntary use of multi-year averaging of MRFSS harvest data for purposes of developing management measures for their summer flounder fisheries.


The Council held a scoping meeting to address the possible need for a controlled access system for the Atlantic mackerel fishery that is governed by the Council’s Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish FMP. Another such meeting will be held on March 28, 2005 in Newport, RI in conjunction with the New England Council’s March meeting. Following scoping and review of public comments, the Council will determine how to address this issue and incorporate it into its Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish FMP. The first meeting related to Framework 1 of the Council’s Dogfish FMP was also held to address the possibility of establishing multi-year specifications for spiny dogfish. At the Council’s May meeting, the Council will convene a second meeting to further consider this framework and, if approved and adopted by the Council, Framework 1 will be submitted to the Secretary for approval.


In response to a letter from the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC), the MAFMC voted to notify the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) that joint planning for monkfish and dogfish be terminated, and that the NEFMC take sole responsibility for the Monkfish FMP and the MAFMC take sole responsibility for the Spiny Dogfish FMP. These changes in management responsibility would be contingent on the NEFMC adopting a like position. The MAFMC also voted to request from the Secretary that it be granted sole authority for the management of smooth dogfish.


 


The Council also identified 13 issues it considers to be of significance regarding the reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA). These issues will be communicated to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for its use in developing the Administration’s position on MSA reauthorization. The five highest priority issues of Council concern include: Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs); Designation of commercial, recreational and environmental Council appointees; National Environmental Protection Act and its interaction with MSA; Separation of science and allocation; and, Saltwater licensing.


In addition to these actions, the MAFMC’s Surfclam-Tilefish Committee conducted a pre-scoping meeting regarding Amendment 1 to the Tilefish FMP. The Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish Committee met to review, revise, and adopt management measures proposed by the Committee’s technical team. Adjustments to the various alternatives contained in the multiple options included in Amendment 9 were adopted and the revised schedule for production of the amendment’s public hearing document was accepted.


The March Council meeting also served as a forum for two NMFS meetings. NMFS conducted a public hearing regarding its Draft Environmental Impact Statement on its proposed amendment to its Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan. NMFS also provided a review of the principal proposed management measures contained in Amendment 2 to the Secretary’s FMP for Atlantic Tunas, Swordfish, and Sharks.


Council to Develop Framework to Allow Multi-State Recreational Harvest Limits for Summer Flounder


The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) met in Kill Devil Hills, NC last week and voted to initiate Framework 6 to its Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan (FMP). This framework is intended to be compatible with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s (ASMFC) Addendum XVII to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass FMP. If adopted, this action would allow both management authorities to divide recreational harvest limits for summer flounder into two or more subregions of the east coast (Maine through North Carolina) for the 2006 fishing year and thereafter. In addition, this Framework would also make available to states the voluntary use of multi-year averaging of MRFSS harvest data for purposes of developing management measures for their summer flounder fisheries.


The Council held a scoping meeting to address the possible need for a controlled access system for the Atlantic mackerel fishery that is governed by the Council’s Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish FMP. Another such meeting will be held on March 28, 2005 in Newport, RI in conjunction with the New England Council’s March meeting. Following scoping and review of public comments, the Council will determine how to address this issue and incorporate it into its Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish FMP. The first meeting related to Framework 1 of the Council’s Dogfish FMP was also held to address the possibility of establishing multi-year specifications for spiny dogfish. At the Council’s May meeting, the Council will convene a second meeting to further consider this framework and, if approved and adopted by the Council, Framework 1 will be submitted to the Secretary for approval.


In response to a letter from the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC), the MAFMC voted to notify the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) that joint planning for monkfish and dogfish be terminated, and that the NEFMC take sole responsibility for the Monkfish FMP and the MAFMC take sole responsibility for the Spiny Dogfish FMP. These changes in management responsibility would be contingent on the NEFMC adopting a like position. The MAFMC also voted to request from the Secretary that it be granted sole authority for the management of smooth dogfish.


 


The Council also identified 13 issues it considers to be of significance regarding the reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA). These issues will be communicated to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for its use in developing the Administration’s position on MSA reauthorization. The five highest priority issues of Council concern include: Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs); Designation of commercial, recreational and environmental Council appointees; National Environmental Protection Act and its interaction with MSA; Separation of science and allocation; and, Saltwater licensing.


In addition to these actions, the MAFMC’s Surfclam-Tilefish Committee conducted a pre-scoping meeting regarding Amendment 1 to the Tilefish FMP. The Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish Committee met to review, revise, and adopt management measures proposed by the Committee’s technical team. Adjustments to the various alternatives contained in the multiple options included in Amendment 9 were adopted and the revised schedule for production of the amendment’s public hearing document was accepted.


The March Council meeting also served as a forum for two NMFS meetings. NMFS conducted a public hearing regarding its Draft Environmental Impact Statement on its proposed amendment to its Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan. NMFS also provided a review of the principal proposed management measures contained in Amendment 2 to the Secretary’s FMP for Atlantic Tunas, Swordfish, and Sharks.

Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading