Crowd focuses on risk to inlets


Crowd focuses on risk to inlets


Shoaling deemed threat to economy

By JERRY ALLEGOOD, Staff Writer

SWANSBORO — Shallow inlets that divide the coastal barrier islands brought together hundreds of people Thursday who are worried that losing the inlets to sandbars will threaten the entire coast.
About 600 people packed the Rotary Civic Center in Swansboro for a meeting to discuss the growing danger of too much sand in the inlets and not enough money to keep them open. A few Coast Guard officials attended, as did representatives of U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Dole and Richard Burr and Reps. Walter Jones and Mike McIntyre.

Speakers called on state and federal officials to replace the loss of federal funds that traditionally have paid for dredging to keep the inlets open.

Fishermen, boaters and merchants said the gaps in the barrier islands provide crucial access to the ocean.

President Bush’s 2005 budget has no money for five shallow inlets: Lockwoods Folly, New Topsail, New River, Bogue and Carolina Beach inlet.

Capt. Stan Jarusinski, president of the Onslow Bay Saltwater Fishing Club, said at least $5 million is needed to properly maintain inlets threatened by shoaling, the rising of the sandbars.

He said government agencies find money when disasters strike and they should do the same with the current threat.

“I’m sure that they can find emergency money somewhere,” he said.

Lee Manning, operator of two charter boats that use Bogue Inlet in Carteret County, said he can’t run his two boats through the inlet if depth is less than 5 feet.

“If the inlet were to close and we couldn’t go out, it would be devastating to me,” he said.

He said he takes 4,000 people on fishing charters during the summer.

Speakers said the impact extends beyond those who work or play in the water. Felton Murray, president of the Swansboro Rotary Club, said Bogue Inlet is used extensively by boats during the club’s annual King Mackerel fishing tournament. He said the tournament, scheduled in May, attracts about 300 boats and brings $1.3 million to the local economy.

The club sponsors scholarships and other community projects, he said.

Scott Chadwick, a representative of the Swansboro Chamber of Commerce, said shoaling threatens two industries — tourism and the military — that drive Eastern North Carolina’s economy. Marine Corps officials have warned that shoaling could interfere with training at the Camp Lejeune Marine Corps base.

Chadwick said using deeper inlets farther away, as has been suggested, is not acceptable for local residents and businesses. Chadwick, who runs a plant nursery, said loss of boating will ripple through the economy, harming restaurants, gas stations and others.

The impact is not just local, said Chuck Routh of Kernersville, near Winston-Salem.

Routh, who also has a home in Carteret County, drove 250 miles to attend the meeting. He said boaters from inland areas also rely on the inlets, and many are not familiar with local waters.

For years the Army Corps of Engineers has dredged the shallow inlets four times a year to maintain a depth of 6 to 8 feet of water. Some channels, including New River, currently have about 3 feet of water.

The Coast Guard has started removing channel markers from inlets that are too shallow for its boats to work.

The Swansboro meeting drew government officials and business leaders from Carteret to Brunswick counties. Participants snatched up bumper stickers bearing the slogan “Save the Inlets.”

They collected donations for a recently formed organization called the Alliance of North Carolina Inlets. They also lined up to sign petitions calling for dredging to keep the waterways open.

“Loss of life can be expected with rescue attempts impeded or access to marooned vessels will be denied,” the petition said.

Staff writer Jerry Allegood can be reached at (252) 752-8411 or


je****@ne**********.com











.


Crowd focuses on risk to inlets


Shoaling deemed threat to economy

By JERRY ALLEGOOD, Staff Writer

SWANSBORO — Shallow inlets that divide the coastal barrier islands brought together hundreds of people Thursday who are worried that losing the inlets to sandbars will threaten the entire coast.
About 600 people packed the Rotary Civic Center in Swansboro for a meeting to discuss the growing danger of too much sand in the inlets and not enough money to keep them open. A few Coast Guard officials attended, as did representatives of U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Dole and Richard Burr and Reps. Walter Jones and Mike McIntyre.

Speakers called on state and federal officials to replace the loss of federal funds that traditionally have paid for dredging to keep the inlets open.

Fishermen, boaters and merchants said the gaps in the barrier islands provide crucial access to the ocean.

President Bush’s 2005 budget has no money for five shallow inlets: Lockwoods Folly, New Topsail, New River, Bogue and Carolina Beach inlet.

Capt. Stan Jarusinski, president of the Onslow Bay Saltwater Fishing Club, said at least $5 million is needed to properly maintain inlets threatened by shoaling, the rising of the sandbars.

He said government agencies find money when disasters strike and they should do the same with the current threat.

“I’m sure that they can find emergency money somewhere,” he said.

Lee Manning, operator of two charter boats that use Bogue Inlet in Carteret County, said he can’t run his two boats through the inlet if depth is less than 5 feet.

“If the inlet were to close and we couldn’t go out, it would be devastating to me,” he said.

He said he takes 4,000 people on fishing charters during the summer.

Speakers said the impact extends beyond those who work or play in the water. Felton Murray, president of the Swansboro Rotary Club, said Bogue Inlet is used extensively by boats during the club’s annual King Mackerel fishing tournament. He said the tournament, scheduled in May, attracts about 300 boats and brings $1.3 million to the local economy.

The club sponsors scholarships and other community projects, he said.

Scott Chadwick, a representative of the Swansboro Chamber of Commerce, said shoaling threatens two industries — tourism and the military — that drive Eastern North Carolina’s economy. Marine Corps officials have warned that shoaling could interfere with training at the Camp Lejeune Marine Corps base.

Chadwick said using deeper inlets farther away, as has been suggested, is not acceptable for local residents and businesses. Chadwick, who runs a plant nursery, said loss of boating will ripple through the economy, harming restaurants, gas stations and others.

The impact is not just local, said Chuck Routh of Kernersville, near Winston-Salem.

Routh, who also has a home in Carteret County, drove 250 miles to attend the meeting. He said boaters from inland areas also rely on the inlets, and many are not familiar with local waters.

For years the Army Corps of Engineers has dredged the shallow inlets four times a year to maintain a depth of 6 to 8 feet of water. Some channels, including New River, currently have about 3 feet of water.

The Coast Guard has started removing channel markers from inlets that are too shallow for its boats to work.

The Swansboro meeting drew government officials and business leaders from Carteret to Brunswick counties. Participants snatched up bumper stickers bearing the slogan “Save the Inlets.”

They collected donations for a recently formed organization called the Alliance of North Carolina Inlets. They also lined up to sign petitions calling for dredging to keep the waterways open.

“Loss of life can be expected with rescue attempts impeded or access to marooned vessels will be denied,” the petition said.

Staff writer Jerry Allegood can be reached at (252) 752-8411 or


je****@ne**********.com











.

Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading