Fishing Rights Alliance (FRA) today filed a lawsuit to stop Amendment 16

Fishing Rights Alliance (FRA) today filed a lawsuit to stop Amendment 16

The Fishing Rights Alliance (FRA) today filed a lawsuit in the Federal District in Jacksonville, Florida against the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) challenging Amendment 16 to the Grouper Snapper Regulations in the South Atlantic. Amendment 16 imposes a 4 month ban on Grouper fishing each year from January through April. Amendment 16 also reduces the number of grouper from 5 fish to 3 for the entire year.
The full complaint is attached as a pdf.
 
The action is based upon the premise that the Amendment is based upon what has been described as the “fatally flawed” Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) by the chairman of the National Research Council’s review of MRFSS. Congress has mandated that this survey be revamped by January 2009, this still has not occurred.
 
The process involves the National Marine Fisheries Service making a determination and the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) formulating a rule to end the alleged overfishing.
 
The NMFS and the SAFMC have failed to follow the Magnuson Stevens Act (MSA) in the in formulation Amendment 16 by:
1.      Failing to conduct an MSA-required economic impact study.
2.      Refusing MSA-required consideration of a Mixed-Stock Exception to the proposed amendment.
3.      Using the MRFSS to formulate Amendment 16 when they have been required to revamp the system.
4.      Refusing to enact alternatives of venting tools and circle hooks as a means to reduce bycatch as required by the MSA.
5.      Setting an allocation of 95% commercial 5% recreational for Golden Tilefish and Snowy Grouper in violation of the MSA.
 
The following graph shows the health of the Grouper stocks and the fallacy of the NMFS position

 

This lawsuit was made necessary because NMFS failed to respect the Congressional mandate to base its decisions on scientifically valid information. The MRFSS program has been recognized as fatally flawed for a number of years. –  Dennis O’Hern, Executive Director of the FRA.
 
We need to break the cycle of “fishing regulations of, by and for the National Marine Fisheries Service” explains Dennis O’Hern, Executive Director of the Fishing Rights Alliance.
 
 
 
QUOTES from Dave Heil
“It is apparent that the SAFMC and NMFS have a predetermined agenda to impose unsupported regulations and closures that are not supported by the “fatally flawed” MRFSS system.”
 
“The MRFSS system has been stated to be fatally flawed by the chairman of the National Research Council in a Congressional review of the MRFSS system and to base such draconian regulations on such a system is irresponsible on the part of Dr. Roy Crabtree of NOAA, NMFS and the SAFMC.”
 
“We are confident that the Federal Court will reject Amendment 16 and require the SAFMC and the NMFS to revamp the data collection system, conduct an economic study of the impact of the Amendment and follow the requirements of the Magnuson Stevens Act in formulating regulations.”
 
“This is the first in what we believe will be a series of legal challenges to present and future Amendments to the regulations.”
 
 
The FRA is also committed to challenging any closure of the Red Snapper fishery that is based upon the fatally flawed MFRSS.
 
WHO WE ARE:
 The FRA is an advocate for the interests of recreational saltwater offshore anglers.
 
OUR MISSION:
To conserve and protect our marine resources and our right to access those resources. The FRA promotes reasonable and effective management policies primarily through community and government activism and education.
The FRA seeks to enhance the angler’s understanding of their marine resources and the scientific practices and regulatory policies that dictate fishing rules.
 
 
For more information contact:
 
Dave Heil
Fishing Rights Alliance Counsel
Chairman, FRA South Atlantic Chapter
407-492-1991
Dheil331@gmail.com
 
Craig Berman
FRA General Counsel
Berman Law Firm, P.A.
PLAZATOWERS
111 Second Avenue NE
Suite 706
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
727.550.8989
 
Dennis O’Hern
Executive Director
Fishing Rights Alliance , Inc.
4604 49th Street N #34
St. Petersburg, FL
727.692.6902
WWW.THEFRA.ORG

Fishing Rights Alliance (FRA) today filed a lawsuit to stop Amendment 16

The Fishing Rights Alliance (FRA) today filed a lawsuit in the Federal District in Jacksonville, Florida against the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) challenging Amendment 16 to the Grouper Snapper Regulations in the South Atlantic. Amendment 16 imposes a 4 month ban on Grouper fishing each year from January through April. Amendment 16 also reduces the number of grouper from 5 fish to 3 for the entire year.

The full complaint is attached as a pdf.

 

The action is based upon the premise that the Amendment is based upon what has been described as the “fatally flawed” Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) by the chairman of the National Research Council’s review of MRFSS. Congress has mandated that this survey be revamped by January 2009, this still has not occurred.

 

The process involves the National Marine Fisheries Service making a determination and the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) formulating a rule to end the alleged overfishing.

 

The NMFS and the SAFMC have failed to follow the Magnuson Stevens Act (MSA) in the in formulation Amendment 16 by:

1.      Failing to conduct an MSA-required economic impact study.

2.      Refusing MSA-required consideration of a Mixed-Stock Exception to the proposed amendment.

3.      Using the MRFSS to formulate Amendment 16 when they have been required to revamp the system.

4.      Refusing to enact alternatives of venting tools and circle hooks as a means to reduce bycatch as required by the MSA.

5.      Setting an allocation of 95% commercial 5% recreational for Golden Tilefish and Snowy Grouper in violation of the MSA.

 

The following graph shows the health of the Grouper stocks and the fallacy of the NMFS position

 

This lawsuit was made necessary because NMFS failed to respect the Congressional mandate to base its decisions on scientifically valid information. The MRFSS program has been recognized as fatally flawed for a number of years. –  Dennis O’Hern, Executive Director of the FRA.

 

We need to break the cycle of “fishing regulations of, by and for the National Marine Fisheries Service” explains Dennis O’Hern, Executive Director of the Fishing Rights Alliance.

 

 

 

QUOTES from Dave Heil

“It is apparent that the SAFMC and NMFS have a predetermined agenda to impose unsupported regulations and closures that are not supported by the “fatally flawed” MRFSS system.”

 

“The MRFSS system has been stated to be fatally flawed by the chairman of the National Research Council in a Congressional review of the MRFSS system and to base such draconian regulations on such a system is irresponsible on the part of Dr. Roy Crabtree of NOAA, NMFS and the SAFMC.”

 

“We are confident that the Federal Court will reject Amendment 16 and require the SAFMC and the NMFS to revamp the data collection system, conduct an economic study of the impact of the Amendment and follow the requirements of the Magnuson Stevens Act in formulating regulations.”

 

“This is the first in what we believe will be a series of legal challenges to present and future Amendments to the regulations.”

 

 

The FRA is also committed to challenging any closure of the Red Snapper fishery that is based upon the fatally flawed MFRSS.

 

WHO WE ARE:

 The FRA is an advocate for the interests of recreational saltwater offshore anglers.

 

OUR MISSION:

To conserve and protect our marine resources and our right to access those resources. The FRA promotes reasonable and effective management policies primarily through community and government activism and education.

The FRA seeks to enhance the angler’s understanding of their marine resources and the scientific practices and regulatory policies that dictate fishing rules.

 

 

For more information contact:

 

Dave Heil

Fishing Rights Alliance Counsel

Chairman, FRA South Atlantic Chapter

407-492-1991

Dheil331@gmail.com

 

Craig Berman

FRA General Counsel

Berman Law Firm, P.A.

PLAZATOWERS

111 Second Avenue NE

Suite 706

St. Petersburg, FL 33701

727.550.8989

 

Dennis O’Hern

Executive Director

Fishing Rights Alliance , Inc.

4604 49th Street N #34

St. Petersburg, FL

727.692.6902

WWW.THEFRA.ORG
Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading