Gag Grouper and Vermilion Snapper

Gag Grouper and Vermilion Snapper


Attendance high at scoping meeting, new assessment for vermilion snapper scheduled


 


     Nearly 100 fishermen attended the final in a series of public scoping meetings held by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council last week in North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  The scoping meeting, held in conjunction with the Council’s quarterly week-long meeting, was the last in a series of six meetings held along the South Atlantic coast in September.  The Council solicited input from the public on measures needed to reduce the harvest of gag grouper and vermilion snapper in order to end overfishing for these species.  In June 2007, stock assessments of these economically important species identified that overfishing was occurring.  Fishermen face a 37% reduction in the harvest of gag and a 61% reduction in the harvest of vermilion snapper. By law, the Council has one year to end overfishing for these species.


 


     In public scoping meetings and through written comments, fishermen expressed their concerns about the economic impacts of the proposed reductions and questioned the validity of data used in the stock assessments that determined the overfishing status.  “We’ve been going in the right direction and we’ve seen improvements with the stocks,” said Chris Long, a commercial fisherman from Little River, South Carolina.  “But these new cuts will put us out of business.  It’s that simple.”  Many of the other fishermen attending the scoping meetings, including charter captains and headboat operators, agreed. 


 


     After reviewing the comments received from the public scoping process and recommendations from the Snapper Grouper Advisory Panel, Council members approved a list of management alternatives to include in Amendment 16 to the Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plan to achieve the necessary reductions.  These include an option for establishing two management “regions”, one that includes North Carolina and South Carolina and another for Florida and Georgia.  This regional approach acknowledges differences in the snapper grouper fishery for these two areas.  Allocation alternatives between commercial and recreational sectors will also be included in the document.  A public hearing document that includes economic, social, and biological impacts of the alternatives is expected to be approved by the Council during its December 3-7, 2007 meeting in Atlantic Beach, North Carolina.  Public hearings for Amendment 16 are currently scheduled for early 2008.


 


     In response to a request by the North Carolina Marine Fisheries Commission, Dr. Roy Crabtree, Regional Administrator for the National Marine Fisheries Service, also committed to conducting an age-based assessment of vermilion snapper for the South Atlantic region.  The overfishing status of vermilion snapper was determined earlier by using length-based data.  Using samples of ear bones from fish, known as otoliths, the age-based assessment is expected to be completed in time to provide NMFS the opportunity to review the assessment results prior to implementing any vermilion snapper regulations proposed by the Council.  Fishermen spoke in support of the age-based assessment, hoping that it supports their observations of large quantities of larger vermilion snapper being reported by both commercial and recreational fishermen.


    


     The Council also approved Amendments 15A and 15B to the Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plan for public hearings.   Amendment 15A addresses stock rebuilding alternatives for snowy grouper, black sea bass, and red porgy, while Amendment 15B includes actions to prohibit the sale of recreationally-caught fish, reduce effects on sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish if hooked, implement a plan to monitor and assess bycatch, address commercial permit renewal periods and transferability, and establish allocations for snowy grouper and red porgy.  Public hearings for both amendments are scheduled for November 2007.   


 


     In other actions, George J. Geiger, an inshore charter captain from Sebastian, Florida was reappointed to serve a second consecutive year as Chairman of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council.  Duane Harris of St. Simon’s Island, Georgia has been reappointed to serve as Vice-Chair.  Mr. Harris is retired as Director of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Resources Division. 


 


     The next meeting of the Council is scheduled for December 3-7, 2007 in Atlantic Beach, NC.

Gag Grouper and Vermilion Snapper


Attendance high at scoping meeting, new assessment for vermilion snapper scheduled


 


     Nearly 100 fishermen attended the final in a series of public scoping meetings held by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council last week in North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  The scoping meeting, held in conjunction with the Council’s quarterly week-long meeting, was the last in a series of six meetings held along the South Atlantic coast in September.  The Council solicited input from the public on measures needed to reduce the harvest of gag grouper and vermilion snapper in order to end overfishing for these species.  In June 2007, stock assessments of these economically important species identified that overfishing was occurring.  Fishermen face a 37% reduction in the harvest of gag and a 61% reduction in the harvest of vermilion snapper. By law, the Council has one year to end overfishing for these species.


 


     In public scoping meetings and through written comments, fishermen expressed their concerns about the economic impacts of the proposed reductions and questioned the validity of data used in the stock assessments that determined the overfishing status.  “We’ve been going in the right direction and we’ve seen improvements with the stocks,” said Chris Long, a commercial fisherman from Little River, South Carolina.  “But these new cuts will put us out of business.  It’s that simple.”  Many of the other fishermen attending the scoping meetings, including charter captains and headboat operators, agreed. 


 


     After reviewing the comments received from the public scoping process and recommendations from the Snapper Grouper Advisory Panel, Council members approved a list of management alternatives to include in Amendment 16 to the Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plan to achieve the necessary reductions.  These include an option for establishing two management “regions”, one that includes North Carolina and South Carolina and another for Florida and Georgia.  This regional approach acknowledges differences in the snapper grouper fishery for these two areas.  Allocation alternatives between commercial and recreational sectors will also be included in the document.  A public hearing document that includes economic, social, and biological impacts of the alternatives is expected to be approved by the Council during its December 3-7, 2007 meeting in Atlantic Beach, North Carolina.  Public hearings for Amendment 16 are currently scheduled for early 2008.


 


     In response to a request by the North Carolina Marine Fisheries Commission, Dr. Roy Crabtree, Regional Administrator for the National Marine Fisheries Service, also committed to conducting an age-based assessment of vermilion snapper for the South Atlantic region.  The overfishing status of vermilion snapper was determined earlier by using length-based data.  Using samples of ear bones from fish, known as otoliths, the age-based assessment is expected to be completed in time to provide NMFS the opportunity to review the assessment results prior to implementing any vermilion snapper regulations proposed by the Council.  Fishermen spoke in support of the age-based assessment, hoping that it supports their observations of large quantities of larger vermilion snapper being reported by both commercial and recreational fishermen.


    


     The Council also approved Amendments 15A and 15B to the Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plan for public hearings.   Amendment 15A addresses stock rebuilding alternatives for snowy grouper, black sea bass, and red porgy, while Amendment 15B includes actions to prohibit the sale of recreationally-caught fish, reduce effects on sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish if hooked, implement a plan to monitor and assess bycatch, address commercial permit renewal periods and transferability, and establish allocations for snowy grouper and red porgy.  Public hearings for both amendments are scheduled for November 2007.   


 


     In other actions, George J. Geiger, an inshore charter captain from Sebastian, Florida was reappointed to serve a second consecutive year as Chairman of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council.  Duane Harris of St. Simon’s Island, Georgia has been reappointed to serve as Vice-Chair.  Mr. Harris is retired as Director of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Resources Division. 


 


     The next meeting of the Council is scheduled for December 3-7, 2007 in Atlantic Beach, NC.

Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading