March Meeting Followup: Mackerel and Shrimp Management Issues Moving Forward


March Meeting Followup: Mackerel and Shrimp Management Issues Moving Forward

During its March meeting in St. Simons Island, Georgia, the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council set priorities for proposed management options affecting mackerel, shrimp, and snapper/grouper fisheries in federal waters in the south Atlantic region. These management measures include continuing the permit moratorium for king mackerel, possible permit requirements for the shrimp fishery, and changes in current regulations affecting snapper/grouper species. Because of timing concerns for addressing specific issues, the Council agreed to focus on amendments affecting both mackerel and shrimp fisheries between now and its June meeting in Florida.

Mackerel
King and Spanish mackerel stocks migrate between council jurisdictions and are managed jointly by the South Atlantic Council and the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. An amendment to the joint management plan for Coastal Migratory Pelagics, which includes mackerel, is being developed to address the current permit moratorium for king mackerel and provide options to modify the fishing year designation. The permit moratorium is scheduled to expire October 15, 2005. The current fishing year for Atlantic migratory groups of both king and Spanish mackerel begins April 1st.

“The continuance of the permit moratorium is important to prevent overcapitalization in the fishery and continue the sustainability of this fishery,” stated George Geiger, a Florida Council representative and Chairman of the South Atlantic Council’s Mackerel Committee. “In addition to the permit moratorium alternatives, the Council is considering a change in the mackerel fishing year to provide an opportunity for North Carolina fishermen to fish for king mackerel during March closures for other species.” The Council will hold a series of scoping meetings to receive input from the public regarding these management options. Scoping meetings for Amendment 15 to the Coastal Migratory Pelagics FMP are being scheduled to begin in April. Details of the meeting schedule will be publicized once they are finalized.

Shrimp
During a meeting of the Shrimp Committee, management options were reviewed for the shrimp fishery through Amendment 6 to the Shrimp FMP. These measures include a requirement for federal permits for the penaeid (white, pink and brown shrimp) fishery in the south Atlantic Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). These permits would provide an accurate and efficient method to identify and quantify vessels that fish in south Atlantic federal waters and provide an avenue to improve data collection in the shrimp fishery. At this time, the Council is considering open access permits but could develop a limited access fishery in the EEZ in the future.

At its December 2003 meeting, the Council voted to establish a control date of December 10, 2003 for the shrimp fishery in the south Atlantic EEZ. This control date puts the industry on notice
(Federal Register Notice) that the Council could develop a limited access program for the fishery in the future. Comments regarding the control date are being accepted until April 5, 2004 and should be directed to the Council office. Other management options in Amendment 6 include measures to address bycatch in the rock shrimp fishery and protocol for testing bycatch reduction devices in the shrimp fishery. Public hearings regarding Amendment 6 to the Shrimp FMP are planned for later this year.

Snapper Grouper Management Complex
In other actions, the Council approved recommendations from the Snapper Grouper Committee that further narrows the list of alternatives for management options in Amendment 13B to the Snapper Grouper FMP. The Amendment includes options for changes in current regulations for many of the 73 species included in the snapper/grouper management complex, including size limits, bag limits, commercial trip limits and other management measures. Amendment 13B is being developed to address mandates of the Sustainable Fisheries Act designed to prevent overfishing and rebuild overfished stocks. Alternatives were narrowed in order to receive more detailed analyses of the options in preparation of the public hearing draft of Amendment 13B. The Council will review the document again in September, during its meeting in Pawleys Island, South Carolina.


March Meeting Followup: Mackerel and Shrimp Management Issues Moving Forward

During its March meeting in St. Simons Island, Georgia, the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council set priorities for proposed management options affecting mackerel, shrimp, and snapper/grouper fisheries in federal waters in the south Atlantic region. These management measures include continuing the permit moratorium for king mackerel, possible permit requirements for the shrimp fishery, and changes in current regulations affecting snapper/grouper species. Because of timing concerns for addressing specific issues, the Council agreed to focus on amendments affecting both mackerel and shrimp fisheries between now and its June meeting in Florida.

Mackerel
King and Spanish mackerel stocks migrate between council jurisdictions and are managed jointly by the South Atlantic Council and the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. An amendment to the joint management plan for Coastal Migratory Pelagics, which includes mackerel, is being developed to address the current permit moratorium for king mackerel and provide options to modify the fishing year designation. The permit moratorium is scheduled to expire October 15, 2005. The current fishing year for Atlantic migratory groups of both king and Spanish mackerel begins April 1st.

“The continuance of the permit moratorium is important to prevent overcapitalization in the fishery and continue the sustainability of this fishery,” stated George Geiger, a Florida Council representative and Chairman of the South Atlantic Council’s Mackerel Committee. “In addition to the permit moratorium alternatives, the Council is considering a change in the mackerel fishing year to provide an opportunity for North Carolina fishermen to fish for king mackerel during March closures for other species.” The Council will hold a series of scoping meetings to receive input from the public regarding these management options. Scoping meetings for Amendment 15 to the Coastal Migratory Pelagics FMP are being scheduled to begin in April. Details of the meeting schedule will be publicized once they are finalized.

Shrimp
During a meeting of the Shrimp Committee, management options were reviewed for the shrimp fishery through Amendment 6 to the Shrimp FMP. These measures include a requirement for federal permits for the penaeid (white, pink and brown shrimp) fishery in the south Atlantic Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). These permits would provide an accurate and efficient method to identify and quantify vessels that fish in south Atlantic federal waters and provide an avenue to improve data collection in the shrimp fishery. At this time, the Council is considering open access permits but could develop a limited access fishery in the EEZ in the future.

At its December 2003 meeting, the Council voted to establish a control date of December 10, 2003 for the shrimp fishery in the south Atlantic EEZ. This control date puts the industry on notice
(Federal Register Notice) that the Council could develop a limited access program for the fishery in the future. Comments regarding the control date are being accepted until April 5, 2004 and should be directed to the Council office. Other management options in Amendment 6 include measures to address bycatch in the rock shrimp fishery and protocol for testing bycatch reduction devices in the shrimp fishery. Public hearings regarding Amendment 6 to the Shrimp FMP are planned for later this year.

Snapper Grouper Management Complex
In other actions, the Council approved recommendations from the Snapper Grouper Committee that further narrows the list of alternatives for management options in Amendment 13B to the Snapper Grouper FMP. The Amendment includes options for changes in current regulations for many of the 73 species included in the snapper/grouper management complex, including size limits, bag limits, commercial trip limits and other management measures. Amendment 13B is being developed to address mandates of the Sustainable Fisheries Act designed to prevent overfishing and rebuild overfished stocks. Alternatives were narrowed in order to receive more detailed analyses of the options in preparation of the public hearing draft of Amendment 13B. The Council will review the document again in September, during its meeting in Pawleys Island, South Carolina.

Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading