N.C. Environmental Commissions Review Historic Coastal Habitat Protection Plan At Joint Meeting In Raleigh N.C. Environmental Commissions Review Historic Coastal Habitat Protection Plan At Joint Meeting In Raleigh
RALEIGH – Members of North Carolina’s three main environmental commissions met Thursday to review and discuss a historic plan designed to change the way the state protects special places along the coast that are critical to the survival of flounder, oysters, red drum and other marine creatures.
“This is an important day in North Carolina’s efforts to manage its natural resources,” said Bill Ross, secretary of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, before presenting the proposed Coastal Habitat Protection Plan, or CHPP, to the Environmental Management, Coastal Resources and Marine Fisheries commissions.
Required by the Fisheries Reform Act passed by the N.C. General Assembly in 1997 as a way to recover slumping fish stocks, the draft CHPP describes critical habitats where marine fish and shellfish feed, spawn and grow. It also details the threats to those habitats and outlines four broad goals that need to be reached in order to protect and enhance each habitat. A committee comprised of members from each of the three commissions guided the drafters of the CHPP.
The legislation also directed, for the first time, the three commissions to cooperate to carry out the goals outlined in the plan.
To start that process, members met in a rare joint session yesterday to formally receive the draft plan from the state agencies that wrote it. The plan has been the subject of 20 public meetings across the state during the past two years. The three commissions have until the end of the year to adopt the plan and then must devise coordinated strategies to meet its goals.
The panels have their work cut out for them, Ross noted. “My message is we the people of North Carolina have a problem and you – the commissions, we who work with the agencies and everyone who lives in, works in and recreates in North Carolina – are a crucial part of the solution.”
Mike Street, chief of the Habitat Protection Section of the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries, detailed some of those problems. The draft CHPP, he told the commission members, describes six types of critical marine habitats – the water, wetlands, underwater sea grasses, and water bottoms made up of shell, mud, sand or rock. Many types of fish and shellfish rely on more than one type of habitat during their lifetimes.
Some of the habitats have been severely stressed, with dire consequences for the creatures that depend on them, according to Street. Oysters, for instance, need water bottoms made of shell, usually of other oyster shells. But oyster dredging more than 100 years ago decimated many of the state’s shell bottoms, and oyster harvests have been in a slow decline since. The commercial catch is now at historic lows.
Stormwater runoff contains sediment that clouds the water, affecting the growth of underwater grasses that are crucial to the survival of bay scallops and the young of many fish species, Street explained. The runoff can also contain bacteria, he said, making oysters and clams unsafe to eat. Some fishing practices, such as mechanical oyster dredging, can dig up sea grass beds and create clouds of turbidity.
To protect and enhance those habitats, the draft CHPP includes a set of broad goals with specific recommendations related to each goal. The four broad goals are to:
Improve the effectiveness of existing rules and programs protecting coastal fish habitats.
Identify, designate and protect Strategic Habitat Areas.
Enhance and protect important habitats.
Enhance and protect water quality.
Barbara Garrity-Blake, a member of the Marine Fisheries Commission, chaired the Intercomission Review Committee that fashioned the goals and recommendations. Improving the effectiveness of existing rules, she said, was the major concern of the people who attended the public meetings, and the Strategic Habitat Areas are those “super habitats” that deserve particular attention.
“That goal recognizes that, though all fish habitats are important, there are some areas that are especially important,” Garrity-Blake said. “So let’s concentrate on those areas.”
Reaching those goals won’t always require new rules, Ross said. He offered the commission members a far-ranging list of suggested steps his department could take that require no new rules. Coordinating enforcement among the department’s agencies, issuing an annual report on the status of the CHPP, mapping underwater grass beds and oyster shell bottoms, and working to better educate the public about the importance of fish habitats are just some of those steps.
“If there is a problem, a threat, we can do something about it now,” he said. “We thought this is a way to get the ball rolling.”
“The three commissions will probably adopt the goals outlined in the draft CHPP,” said Dr. David Moreau, chairman of the Environmental Management Commission. “I really haven’t heard any negative comments about it,” he said.
The commissions are required to adopt a final version of the plan by Dec. 31.
The trick will be turning the enthusiasm generated yesterday into a working plan that protects those special places, said Jimmy Johnson, chairman of the Marine Fisheries Commission.
“This is a tremendous opportunity,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to build on the momentum over the next three months and take the steps to make this work.”
To learn more about the CHPP or to download a copy of the plan, visit www.ncfisheries.net, or call the Division of Marine Fisheries at (252) 726-7021 or (800) 682-2632.
RALEIGH – Members of North Carolina’s three main environmental commissions met Thursday to review and discuss a historic plan designed to change the way the state protects special places along the coast that are critical to the survival of flounder, oysters, red drum and other marine creatures.
“This is an important day in North Carolina’s efforts to manage its natural resources,” said Bill Ross, secretary of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, before presenting the proposed Coastal Habitat Protection Plan, or CHPP, to the Environmental Management, Coastal Resources and Marine Fisheries commissions.
Required by the Fisheries Reform Act passed by the N.C. General Assembly in 1997 as a way to recover slumping fish stocks, the draft CHPP describes critical habitats where marine fish and shellfish feed, spawn and grow. It also details the threats to those habitats and outlines four broad goals that need to be reached in order to protect and enhance each habitat. A committee comprised of members from each of the three commissions guided the drafters of the CHPP.
The legislation also directed, for the first time, the three commissions to cooperate to carry out the goals outlined in the plan.
To start that process, members met in a rare joint session yesterday to formally receive the draft plan from the state agencies that wrote it. The plan has been the subject of 20 public meetings across the state during the past two years. The three commissions have until the end of the year to adopt the plan and then must devise coordinated strategies to meet its goals.
The panels have their work cut out for them, Ross noted. “My message is we the people of North Carolina have a problem and you – the commissions, we who work with the agencies and everyone who lives in, works in and recreates in North Carolina – are a crucial part of the solution.”
Mike Street, chief of the Habitat Protection Section of the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries, detailed some of those problems. The draft CHPP, he told the commission members, describes six types of critical marine habitats – the water, wetlands, underwater sea grasses, and water bottoms made up of shell, mud, sand or rock. Many types of fish and shellfish rely on more than one type of habitat during their lifetimes.
Some of the habitats have been severely stressed, with dire consequences for the creatures that depend on them, according to Street. Oysters, for instance, need water bottoms made of shell, usually of other oyster shells. But oyster dredging more than 100 years ago decimated many of the state’s shell bottoms, and oyster harvests have been in a slow decline since. The commercial catch is now at historic lows.
Stormwater runoff contains sediment that clouds the water, affecting the growth of underwater grasses that are crucial to the survival of bay scallops and the young of many fish species, Street explained. The runoff can also contain bacteria, he said, making oysters and clams unsafe to eat. Some fishing practices, such as mechanical oyster dredging, can dig up sea grass beds and create clouds of turbidity.
To protect and enhance those habitats, the draft CHPP includes a set of broad goals with specific recommendations related to each goal. The four broad goals are to:
Improve the effectiveness of existing rules and programs protecting coastal fish habitats.
Identify, designate and protect Strategic Habitat Areas.
Enhance and protect important habitats.
Enhance and protect water quality.
Barbara Garrity-Blake, a member of the Marine Fisheries Commission, chaired the Intercomission Review Committee that fashioned the goals and recommendations. Improving the effectiveness of existing rules, she said, was the major concern of the people who attended the public meetings, and the Strategic Habitat Areas are those “super habitats” that deserve particular attention.
“That goal recognizes that, though all fish habitats are important, there are some areas that are especially important,” Garrity-Blake said. “So let’s concentrate on those areas.”
Reaching those goals won’t always require new rules, Ross said. He offered the commission members a far-ranging list of suggested steps his department could take that require no new rules. Coordinating enforcement among the department’s agencies, issuing an annual report on the status of the CHPP, mapping underwater grass beds and oyster shell bottoms, and working to better educate the public about the importance of fish habitats are just some of those steps.
“If there is a problem, a threat, we can do something about it now,” he said. “We thought this is a way to get the ball rolling.”
“The three commissions will probably adopt the goals outlined in the draft CHPP,” said Dr. David Moreau, chairman of the Environmental Management Commission. “I really haven’t heard any negative comments about it,” he said.
The commissions are required to adopt a final version of the plan by Dec. 31.
The trick will be turning the enthusiasm generated yesterday into a working plan that protects those special places, said Jimmy Johnson, chairman of the Marine Fisheries Commission.
“This is a tremendous opportunity,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to build on the momentum over the next three months and take the steps to make this work.”
To learn more about the CHPP or to download a copy of the plan, visit www.ncfisheries.net, or call the Division of Marine Fisheries at (252) 726-7021 or (800) 682-2632.
N.C. Environmental Commissions Review Historic Coastal Habitat Protection Plan A
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
Keep Reading
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (315)
- February 2024 (550)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (6)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (8)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (11)
- September 2017 (8)
- August 2017 (17)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (36)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (20)
- June 2016 (17)
- May 2016 (24)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (33)
- February 2016 (37)
- January 2016 (84)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (6)
- January 2014 (5)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (9)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (8)
- September 2012 (15)
- August 2012 (16)
- July 2012 (15)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (7)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (14)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (5)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (40)
- March 2008 (30)
- February 2008 (19)
- January 2008 (53)
- December 2007 (15)
- November 2007 (27)
- October 2007 (16)
- September 2007 (28)
- August 2007 (21)
- July 2007 (25)
- June 2007 (28)
- May 2007 (52)
- April 2007 (28)
- March 2007 (38)
- February 2007 (36)
- January 2007 (25)
- December 2006 (50)
- November 2006 (48)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (20)
- August 2006 (36)
- July 2006 (50)
- June 2006 (74)
- May 2006 (70)
- April 2006 (87)
- March 2006 (139)
- February 2006 (94)
- January 2006 (100)
- December 2005 (99)
- November 2005 (70)
- October 2005 (65)
- September 2005 (43)
- August 2005 (41)
- July 2005 (68)
- June 2005 (68)
- May 2005 (52)
- April 2005 (76)
- March 2005 (104)
- February 2005 (97)
- January 2005 (75)
- December 2004 (90)
- November 2004 (67)
- October 2004 (77)
- September 2004 (44)
- August 2004 (66)
- July 2004 (66)
- June 2004 (68)
- May 2004 (87)
- April 2004 (93)
- March 2004 (99)
- February 2004 (101)
- January 2004 (72)
- December 2003 (20)
- November 2003 (11)