New Data Show Brook Trout Imperiled Throughout Its Eastern Range


New Data Show Brook Trout Imperiled Throughout Its Eastern Range


RALEIGH, N.C. (May 17, 2006) – Brook trout once thrived in nearly every coldwater stream and river in the eastern United States. Over the last century, urbanization, poor land management practices and degraded streamside habitat have ravaged brook trout populations, particularly in North Carolina where this native fish has been eliminated or greatly reduced throughout more than 80 percent of its historical habitat.


And North Carolina is not alone. This grim assessment of the brook trout’s status in North Carolina is similar to other states along the East Coast, according to report released last week by the Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture (EBTJV). The EBTJV, a partnership of state and federal agencies, conservation organizations and academic institutions including Trout Unlimited and the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, is dedicated to restoring brook trout to fishable populations by protecting, restoring and enhancing aquatic habitat throughout the brook trout’s range.


The report, “Eastern Brook Trout: Status and Threats,” provides information on the status of brook trout populations in 17 states along the East Coast, an area that represents 70 percent of the historical range of brook trout in the United States. The report also identifies the principal threats to brook trout populations on a state-by-state basis.


In North Carolina and Tennessee, which share many of the same watersheds, a variety of factors led to the brook trout’s decline. Large-scale logging in the 19th century coupled with poor land management associated with agriculture caused massive soil erosion and opened the formerly shaded streams to the sun. As sediment choked the streams and water quality declined, brook trout began to disappear. In their place, rainbow trout, which are native to the Western United States, and brown trout, which are native to Europe, were introduced. These trout species could tolerate warmer and less pristine waters than brook trout. As a result, they often outcompeted brook trout for food and space.


Today, the majority of North Carolina’s brook trout populations are relegated to headwater streams in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park and Pisgah and Nantahala national forests. These publicly owned lands still have some of the highest quality trout habitat remaining in the Southeast.


However, brook trout populations on private lands in North Carolina face a much bleaker future.


“Continued destruction of brook trout habitat from logging, agriculture and development leave many of the remaining populations particularly vulnerable,” said Doug Besler, coldwater research coordinator for the Wildlife Resources Commission. “Brook trout are an excellent indicator of water quality, and their loss in many of our streams should serve as a wake-up call to the citizens of North Carolina.”


Efforts like the EBTJV seek to educate the public and legislators to the plight brook trout face and generate support that will restore and protect brook trout and reverse these negative trends that are occurring throughout their native range.


The EBTJV began in 2004 as a pilot program for the National Fish Habitat Initiative. This report represents the first collaborative effort to identify the status of brook trout habitat across the entire eastern United States. The full report, as well as state-specific data and maps, is available at www.brookie.org. View a report on North Carolina and Tennessee watersheds (pdf – 1 MB).


New Data Show Brook Trout Imperiled Throughout Its Eastern Range


RALEIGH, N.C. (May 17, 2006) – Brook trout once thrived in nearly every coldwater stream and river in the eastern United States. Over the last century, urbanization, poor land management practices and degraded streamside habitat have ravaged brook trout populations, particularly in North Carolina where this native fish has been eliminated or greatly reduced throughout more than 80 percent of its historical habitat.


And North Carolina is not alone. This grim assessment of the brook trout’s status in North Carolina is similar to other states along the East Coast, according to report released last week by the Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture (EBTJV). The EBTJV, a partnership of state and federal agencies, conservation organizations and academic institutions including Trout Unlimited and the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, is dedicated to restoring brook trout to fishable populations by protecting, restoring and enhancing aquatic habitat throughout the brook trout’s range.


The report, “Eastern Brook Trout: Status and Threats,” provides information on the status of brook trout populations in 17 states along the East Coast, an area that represents 70 percent of the historical range of brook trout in the United States. The report also identifies the principal threats to brook trout populations on a state-by-state basis.


In North Carolina and Tennessee, which share many of the same watersheds, a variety of factors led to the brook trout’s decline. Large-scale logging in the 19th century coupled with poor land management associated with agriculture caused massive soil erosion and opened the formerly shaded streams to the sun. As sediment choked the streams and water quality declined, brook trout began to disappear. In their place, rainbow trout, which are native to the Western United States, and brown trout, which are native to Europe, were introduced. These trout species could tolerate warmer and less pristine waters than brook trout. As a result, they often outcompeted brook trout for food and space.


Today, the majority of North Carolina’s brook trout populations are relegated to headwater streams in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park and Pisgah and Nantahala national forests. These publicly owned lands still have some of the highest quality trout habitat remaining in the Southeast.


However, brook trout populations on private lands in North Carolina face a much bleaker future.


“Continued destruction of brook trout habitat from logging, agriculture and development leave many of the remaining populations particularly vulnerable,” said Doug Besler, coldwater research coordinator for the Wildlife Resources Commission. “Brook trout are an excellent indicator of water quality, and their loss in many of our streams should serve as a wake-up call to the citizens of North Carolina.”


Efforts like the EBTJV seek to educate the public and legislators to the plight brook trout face and generate support that will restore and protect brook trout and reverse these negative trends that are occurring throughout their native range.


The EBTJV began in 2004 as a pilot program for the National Fish Habitat Initiative. This report represents the first collaborative effort to identify the status of brook trout habitat across the entire eastern United States. The full report, as well as state-specific data and maps, is available at www.brookie.org. View a report on North Carolina and Tennessee watersheds (pdf – 1 MB).

Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading