Sinking of fishing vessel Northern Edge BOSTON – The Coast Guard continues its investigation into the capsizing and sinking of the fishing vessel Northern Edge, Dec. 20, 2004. Five fishermen lost their lives when the vessel capsized and sank in frigid waters about 45 miles east southeast of Nantucket, Mass. To conduct a thorough investigation into the sinking of any vessel requires a detailed look into many elements to include crew training, weather, analysis of potential human errors, vessel stability, navigation equipment, safety equipment and the condition of the vessel. Investigations may lead to new safety recommendations or corrective actions for identified unsafe conditions industry-wide. Once complete, marine casualty investigations are available to the public pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. The following facts about the the Northern Edge and its sinking have been determined by Coast Guard investigators and, given the high level of media and public interest in this case, the Coast Guard is releasing these facts while the investigation is still in progress. Coast Guard records indicate the Northern Edge was 75.7-feet in length, and was 153 gross tons. It was owned by K&R Fishing Enterprises, INC. and was homeported in New Bedford, Mass. At about the time of its sinking, on scene weather was: water temperature 40 degrees, seas 8-10 feet, winds 20-25 knots, air temperature 15 degrees with snow showers The Northern Edge was underway and fishing Dec. 20, on what is referred to as a “compensation trip” in the Nantucket Lightship Closed Area. A previous trip to that area in November 2004 was cut short because of a suspected malfunction in the Northern Edge’s Vessel Monitoring System. This equipment transmits information to NOAA Fisheries and is required equipment for scallop fishing vessels operating in that area. To make up for time lost fishing during the November trip, the vessel was permitted to fish for 12,000 pounds of scallops in December. The Coast Guard received an Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacon (EPIRB) signal at 4:44 p.m. Dec. 20 indicating the Northern Edge could be in distress. The Coast Guard then determined the Northern Edge’s position and distress using various sources by 5:05 p.m. The Northern Edge was issued a Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Decal after successfully completing a voluntary safety examination in September 2003 by Coast Guard Marine Safety Field Office New Bedford. Personnel from the Coast Guard Cutter Dependable conducted an at-sea law enforcement boarding on the Northern Edge in November 2004. A total of five deficiencies were discovered. The life raft servicing was overdue, the life raft hydrostatic release was expired, the 406 EPIRB hydrostatic release was expired, there was no documentation of drills being conducted and the lifesaving equipment aboard didn’t have the vessel’s name on it. The life raft was serviced and new hydrostatic releases were purchased following this boarding and prior to the voyage. The Coast Guard interviewed Mr. Pedro Furtado, the lone survivor of the Northern Edge. From the interview, Mr. Furtado provided the following information which is the only known eye witness account of the vessel’s capsizing and sinking. At the time of the incident, the vessel was carrying approximately 230 bags of scallops in the hold, weighing approximately 11,500 pounds. At the time of the incident all five crewmen were on deck and the Captain was in the wheelhouse. The crew was dressed out in oiler suits. At approximately 4:44 p.m. the dredge cable became perpendicular to the starboard stern quarter and the vessel listed sharply to the starboard side. The captain did release the winch brake attempting to slacken both dredge cables and right the vessel. Water came over the starboard rail and filled the main deck because the scupper gates were closed, blocking the freeing ports. The watertight door leading to the engine room and forward compartments was open, allowing water to access those spaces. The fish hold hatch was closed. Attempts were made by the crew to open the scupper gates but they were unsuccessful. The survival suits were located in the crew’s berthing. Two crewmen cut the life raft loose from its bracket and it fell over the side. When Mr. Furtado was getting into the life raft, from which he was later rescued, he observed only one other crewmember in the water who he said drown in the heavy seas. At that time, Mr. Furtado didn’t see the three other crewmembers, who had been on deck at the time of the accident and the Captain, who had been in the wheelhouse. Mr. Furtado was recovered by the fishing vessel Diane Marie about 5:21 p.m., only 37 minutes after the Northern Edge’s EPIRB was first activated, and only 16 minutes after the Coast Guard had sufficient information to determine the vessel’s position. Commercial fishing vessel safety is an important mission of the Coast Guard. Through education, public awareness, voluntary dockside exams and at-sea boardings the Coast Guard continues to work with the fishing community to achieve greater industry safety. The investigation into the sinking of the Northern Edge will continue as the Investigating Officer is presently building a background and history of the vessel, by interviewing the owner, past crewmembers and reviewing Coast Guard documentation on the vessel. Once completed, the Investigating Officer will prepare a final report. The Coast Guard will release any additional significant information if appropriate while the investigation is ongoing. Sinking of fishing vessel Northern Edge BOSTON – The Coast Guard continues its investigation into the capsizing and sinking of the fishing vessel Northern Edge, Dec. 20, 2004. Five fishermen lost their lives when the vessel capsized and sank in frigid waters about 45 miles east southeast of Nantucket, Mass. To conduct a thorough investigation into the sinking of any vessel requires a detailed look into many elements to include crew training, weather, analysis of potential human errors, vessel stability, navigation equipment, safety equipment and the condition of the vessel. Investigations may lead to new safety recommendations or corrective actions for identified unsafe conditions industry-wide. Once complete, marine casualty investigations are available to the public pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. The following facts about the the Northern Edge and its sinking have been determined by Coast Guard investigators and, given the high level of media and public interest in this case, the Coast Guard is releasing these facts while the investigation is still in progress. Coast Guard records indicate the Northern Edge was 75.7-feet in length, and was 153 gross tons. It was owned by K&R Fishing Enterprises, INC. and was homeported in New Bedford, Mass. At about the time of its sinking, on scene weather was: water temperature 40 degrees, seas 8-10 feet, winds 20-25 knots, air temperature 15 degrees with snow showers The Northern Edge was underway and fishing Dec. 20, on what is referred to as a “compensation trip” in the Nantucket Lightship Closed Area. A previous trip to that area in November 2004 was cut short because of a suspected malfunction in the Northern Edge’s Vessel Monitoring System. This equipment transmits information to NOAA Fisheries and is required equipment for scallop fishing vessels operating in that area. To make up for time lost fishing during the November trip, the vessel was permitted to fish for 12,000 pounds of scallops in December. The Coast Guard received an Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacon (EPIRB) signal at 4:44 p.m. Dec. 20 indicating the Northern Edge could be in distress. The Coast Guard then determined the Northern Edge’s position and distress using various sources by 5:05 p.m. The Northern Edge was issued a Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Decal after successfully completing a voluntary safety examination in September 2003 by Coast Guard Marine Safety Field Office New Bedford. Personnel from the Coast Guard Cutter Dependable conducted an at-sea law enforcement boarding on the Northern Edge in November 2004. A total of five deficiencies were discovered. The life raft servicing was overdue, the life raft hydrostatic release was expired, the 406 EPIRB hydrostatic release was expired, there was no documentation of drills being conducted and the lifesaving equipment aboard didn’t have the vessel’s name on it. The life raft was serviced and new hydrostatic releases were purchased following this boarding and prior to the voyage. The Coast Guard interviewed Mr. Pedro Furtado, the lone survivor of the Northern Edge. From the interview, Mr. Furtado provided the following information which is the only known eye witness account of the vessel’s capsizing and sinking. At the time of the incident, the vessel was carrying approximately 230 bags of scallops in the hold, weighing approximately 11,500 pounds. At the time of the incident all five crewmen were on deck and the Captain was in the wheelhouse. The crew was dressed out in oiler suits. At approximately 4:44 p.m. the dredge cable became perpendicular to the starboard stern quarter and the vessel listed sharply to the starboard side. The captain did release the winch brake attempting to slacken both dredge cables and right the vessel. Water came over the starboard rail and filled the main deck because the scupper gates were closed, blocking the freeing ports. The watertight door leading to the engine room and forward compartments was open, allowing water to access those spaces. The fish hold hatch was closed. Attempts were made by the crew to open the scupper gates but they were unsuccessful. The survival suits were located in the crew’s berthing. Two crewmen cut the life raft loose from its bracket and it fell over the side. When Mr. Furtado was getting into the life raft, from which he was later rescued, he observed only one other crewmember in the water who he said drown in the heavy seas. At that time, Mr. Furtado didn’t see the three other crewmembers, who had been on deck at the time of the accident and the Captain, who had been in the wheelhouse. Mr. Furtado was recovered by the fishing vessel Diane Marie about 5:21 p.m., only 37 minutes after the Northern Edge’s EPIRB was first activated, and only 16 minutes after the Coast Guard had sufficient information to determine the vessel’s position. Commercial fishing vessel safety is an important mission of the Coast Guard. Through education, public awareness, voluntary dockside exams and at-sea boardings the Coast Guard continues to work with the fishing community to achieve greater industry safety. The investigation into the sinking of the Northern Edge will continue as the Investigating Officer is presently building a background and history of the vessel, by interviewing the owner, past crewmembers and reviewing Coast Guard documentation on the vessel. Once completed, the Investigating Officer will prepare a final report. The Coast Guard will release any additional significant information if appropriate while the investigation is ongoing.
Sinking of fishing vessel Northern Edge
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
Keep Reading
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (315)
- February 2024 (550)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (6)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (8)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (11)
- September 2017 (8)
- August 2017 (17)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (36)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (20)
- June 2016 (17)
- May 2016 (24)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (33)
- February 2016 (37)
- January 2016 (84)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (6)
- January 2014 (5)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (9)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (8)
- September 2012 (15)
- August 2012 (16)
- July 2012 (15)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (7)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (14)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (5)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (40)
- March 2008 (30)
- February 2008 (19)
- January 2008 (53)
- December 2007 (15)
- November 2007 (27)
- October 2007 (16)
- September 2007 (28)
- August 2007 (21)
- July 2007 (25)
- June 2007 (28)
- May 2007 (52)
- April 2007 (28)
- March 2007 (38)
- February 2007 (36)
- January 2007 (25)
- December 2006 (50)
- November 2006 (48)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (20)
- August 2006 (36)
- July 2006 (50)
- June 2006 (74)
- May 2006 (70)
- April 2006 (87)
- March 2006 (139)
- February 2006 (94)
- January 2006 (100)
- December 2005 (99)
- November 2005 (70)
- October 2005 (65)
- September 2005 (43)
- August 2005 (41)
- July 2005 (68)
- June 2005 (68)
- May 2005 (52)
- April 2005 (76)
- March 2005 (104)
- February 2005 (97)
- January 2005 (75)
- December 2004 (90)
- November 2004 (67)
- October 2004 (77)
- September 2004 (44)
- August 2004 (66)
- July 2004 (66)
- June 2004 (68)
- May 2004 (87)
- April 2004 (93)
- March 2004 (99)
- February 2004 (101)
- January 2004 (72)
- December 2003 (20)
- November 2003 (11)