Sinking of fishing vessel Northern Edge


Sinking of fishing vessel Northern Edge


BOSTON – The Coast Guard continues its investigation into the capsizing and sinking of the fishing vessel Northern Edge, Dec. 20, 2004. Five fishermen lost their lives when the vessel capsized and sank in frigid waters about 45 miles east southeast of Nantucket, Mass.


To conduct a thorough investigation into the sinking of any vessel requires a detailed look into many elements to include crew training, weather, analysis of potential human errors, vessel stability, navigation equipment, safety equipment and the condition of the vessel. Investigations may lead to new safety recommendations or corrective actions for identified unsafe conditions industry-wide. Once complete, marine casualty investigations are available to the public pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.


The following facts about the the Northern Edge and its sinking have been determined by Coast Guard investigators and, given the high level of media and public interest in this case, the Coast Guard is releasing these facts while the investigation is still in progress.




Coast Guard records indicate the Northern Edge was 75.7-feet in length, and was 153 gross tons. It was owned by K&R Fishing Enterprises, INC. and was homeported in New Bedford, Mass.


At about the time of its sinking, on scene weather was: water temperature 40 degrees, seas 8-10 feet, winds 20-25 knots, air temperature 15 degrees with snow showers


The Northern Edge was underway and fishing Dec. 20, on what is referred to as a “compensation trip” in the Nantucket Lightship Closed Area. A previous trip to that area in November 2004 was cut short because of a suspected malfunction in the Northern Edge’s Vessel Monitoring System. This equipment transmits information to NOAA Fisheries and is required equipment for scallop fishing vessels operating in that area. To make up for time lost fishing during the November trip, the vessel was permitted to fish for 12,000 pounds of scallops in December.


The Coast Guard received an Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacon (EPIRB) signal at 4:44 p.m. Dec. 20 indicating the Northern Edge could be in distress. The Coast Guard then determined the Northern Edge’s position and distress using various sources by 5:05 p.m.


The Northern Edge was issued a Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Decal after successfully completing a voluntary safety examination in September 2003 by Coast Guard Marine Safety Field Office New Bedford.


Personnel from the Coast Guard Cutter Dependable conducted an at-sea law enforcement boarding on the Northern Edge in November 2004. A total of five deficiencies were discovered. The life raft servicing was overdue, the life raft hydrostatic release was expired, the 406 EPIRB hydrostatic release was expired, there was no documentation of drills being conducted and the lifesaving equipment aboard didn’t have the vessel’s name on it. The life raft was serviced and new hydrostatic releases were purchased following this boarding and prior to the voyage.


The Coast Guard interviewed Mr. Pedro Furtado, the lone survivor of the Northern Edge. From the interview, Mr. Furtado provided the following information which is the only known eye witness account of the vessel’s capsizing and sinking.




At the time of the incident, the vessel was carrying approximately 230 bags of scallops in the hold, weighing approximately 11,500 pounds.


At the time of the incident all five crewmen were on deck and the Captain was in the wheelhouse. The crew was dressed out in oiler suits.


At approximately 4:44 p.m. the dredge cable became perpendicular to the starboard stern quarter and the vessel listed sharply to the starboard side.


The captain did release the winch brake attempting to slacken both dredge cables and right the vessel.


Water came over the starboard rail and filled the main deck because the scupper gates were closed, blocking the freeing ports. The watertight door leading to the engine room and forward compartments was open, allowing water to access those spaces. The fish hold hatch was closed. Attempts were made by the crew to open the scupper gates but they were unsuccessful.


The survival suits were located in the crew’s berthing.


Two crewmen cut the life raft loose from its bracket and it fell over the side.


When Mr. Furtado was getting into the life raft, from which he was later rescued, he observed only one other crewmember in the water who he said drown in the heavy seas. At that time, Mr. Furtado didn’t see the three other crewmembers, who had been on deck at the time of the accident and the Captain, who had been in the wheelhouse.


Mr. Furtado was recovered by the fishing vessel Diane Marie about 5:21 p.m., only 37 minutes after the Northern Edge’s EPIRB was first activated, and only 16 minutes after the Coast Guard had sufficient information to determine the vessel’s position.


Commercial fishing vessel safety is an important mission of the Coast Guard. Through education, public awareness, voluntary dockside exams and at-sea boardings the Coast Guard continues to work with the fishing community to achieve greater industry safety.


The investigation into the sinking of the Northern Edge will continue as the Investigating Officer is presently building a background and history of the vessel, by interviewing the owner, past crewmembers and reviewing Coast Guard documentation on the vessel. Once completed, the Investigating Officer will prepare a final report.


The Coast Guard will release any additional significant information if appropriate while the investigation is ongoing.


Sinking of fishing vessel Northern Edge


BOSTON – The Coast Guard continues its investigation into the capsizing and sinking of the fishing vessel Northern Edge, Dec. 20, 2004. Five fishermen lost their lives when the vessel capsized and sank in frigid waters about 45 miles east southeast of Nantucket, Mass.


To conduct a thorough investigation into the sinking of any vessel requires a detailed look into many elements to include crew training, weather, analysis of potential human errors, vessel stability, navigation equipment, safety equipment and the condition of the vessel. Investigations may lead to new safety recommendations or corrective actions for identified unsafe conditions industry-wide. Once complete, marine casualty investigations are available to the public pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.


The following facts about the the Northern Edge and its sinking have been determined by Coast Guard investigators and, given the high level of media and public interest in this case, the Coast Guard is releasing these facts while the investigation is still in progress.




Coast Guard records indicate the Northern Edge was 75.7-feet in length, and was 153 gross tons. It was owned by K&R Fishing Enterprises, INC. and was homeported in New Bedford, Mass.


At about the time of its sinking, on scene weather was: water temperature 40 degrees, seas 8-10 feet, winds 20-25 knots, air temperature 15 degrees with snow showers


The Northern Edge was underway and fishing Dec. 20, on what is referred to as a “compensation trip” in the Nantucket Lightship Closed Area. A previous trip to that area in November 2004 was cut short because of a suspected malfunction in the Northern Edge’s Vessel Monitoring System. This equipment transmits information to NOAA Fisheries and is required equipment for scallop fishing vessels operating in that area. To make up for time lost fishing during the November trip, the vessel was permitted to fish for 12,000 pounds of scallops in December.


The Coast Guard received an Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacon (EPIRB) signal at 4:44 p.m. Dec. 20 indicating the Northern Edge could be in distress. The Coast Guard then determined the Northern Edge’s position and distress using various sources by 5:05 p.m.


The Northern Edge was issued a Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Decal after successfully completing a voluntary safety examination in September 2003 by Coast Guard Marine Safety Field Office New Bedford.


Personnel from the Coast Guard Cutter Dependable conducted an at-sea law enforcement boarding on the Northern Edge in November 2004. A total of five deficiencies were discovered. The life raft servicing was overdue, the life raft hydrostatic release was expired, the 406 EPIRB hydrostatic release was expired, there was no documentation of drills being conducted and the lifesaving equipment aboard didn’t have the vessel’s name on it. The life raft was serviced and new hydrostatic releases were purchased following this boarding and prior to the voyage.


The Coast Guard interviewed Mr. Pedro Furtado, the lone survivor of the Northern Edge. From the interview, Mr. Furtado provided the following information which is the only known eye witness account of the vessel’s capsizing and sinking.




At the time of the incident, the vessel was carrying approximately 230 bags of scallops in the hold, weighing approximately 11,500 pounds.


At the time of the incident all five crewmen were on deck and the Captain was in the wheelhouse. The crew was dressed out in oiler suits.


At approximately 4:44 p.m. the dredge cable became perpendicular to the starboard stern quarter and the vessel listed sharply to the starboard side.


The captain did release the winch brake attempting to slacken both dredge cables and right the vessel.


Water came over the starboard rail and filled the main deck because the scupper gates were closed, blocking the freeing ports. The watertight door leading to the engine room and forward compartments was open, allowing water to access those spaces. The fish hold hatch was closed. Attempts were made by the crew to open the scupper gates but they were unsuccessful.


The survival suits were located in the crew’s berthing.


Two crewmen cut the life raft loose from its bracket and it fell over the side.


When Mr. Furtado was getting into the life raft, from which he was later rescued, he observed only one other crewmember in the water who he said drown in the heavy seas. At that time, Mr. Furtado didn’t see the three other crewmembers, who had been on deck at the time of the accident and the Captain, who had been in the wheelhouse.


Mr. Furtado was recovered by the fishing vessel Diane Marie about 5:21 p.m., only 37 minutes after the Northern Edge’s EPIRB was first activated, and only 16 minutes after the Coast Guard had sufficient information to determine the vessel’s position.


Commercial fishing vessel safety is an important mission of the Coast Guard. Through education, public awareness, voluntary dockside exams and at-sea boardings the Coast Guard continues to work with the fishing community to achieve greater industry safety.


The investigation into the sinking of the Northern Edge will continue as the Investigating Officer is presently building a background and history of the vessel, by interviewing the owner, past crewmembers and reviewing Coast Guard documentation on the vessel. Once completed, the Investigating Officer will prepare a final report.


The Coast Guard will release any additional significant information if appropriate while the investigation is ongoing.

Share this article

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

Navigation Center Website Survey Request

We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.

 

Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)

 

 

 

 

U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice

Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.

Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.

Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.

Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More

SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24

1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//

BT

Read More
Keep Reading