Sportfishing Coalition Lauds Improvements to Fisheries Bill by House Resources Committee WASHINGTON – A coalition of leading recreational angling and conservation organizations welcomed today’s action in the U.S. House of Representatives to advance an update of the country’s most important marine fisheries law. The House Resources Committee voted to send H.R. 5018, the American Fisheries Management and Marine Life Protection Act, to the full House. The action moves efforts to improve the Magnuson-Stevens Act one step closer to completion – more than five years after it was supposed to have been reauthorized. The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership’s (TRCP) Angling 4 Oceans campaign had called for the committee to work together to incorporate issues of importance to recreational anglers into the legislation and move it forward. House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) did just that in working with Ranking Member Nick Rahall (D-WV), Fisheries Subcommittee Chairman Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD) and Representative Jim Saxton (R-NJ) to develop the manager’s amendment that was accepted today. In addition, an amendment accepted by the committee added language that considers the economic impacts of all fishing sectors before making fisheries allocations decisions. “Chairman Pombo understands the importance of healthy, sustainable fisheries for recreational saltwater fishing to grow and thrive,” commented Bob Hayes, General Counsel for the Coastal Conservation Association and co-chair of the Angling 4 Oceans working group. “We worked closely with the chairman to ensure that not only is his bill good for anglers, but also good for fish. We will continue to work with him to get a bill out of the House that can be reconciled with the Senate so that we can enact sound fisheries management policy before time runs out this Congress.” The changes made today by the committee bring the bill closer to including all of priorities of the Angling 4 Oceans groups’ four key SALT principles: Science must be used in marine fisheries conservation; Allocation of fisheries resources should be more equitable to recreational fishermen; Licensing saltwater anglers will improve data collection and increase funding; and Tackle used by fishermen should reduce bycatch and not damage habitat. If provisions are included in the final bill that address these principles, recreational saltwater anglers and marine fisheries will benefit. The bill that was reported out of the House Resources Committee today includes an amendment offered by Representative Jim Saxton (R-NJ) that requires that the economic impacts of recreational fishing and all other sectors be considered when making fisheries allocation decisions. The language, one of the top priorities of TRCP’s Angling 4 Oceans campaign, would change the current process of making allocations based on historical catch records – a process that typically favors commercial fishing. “Our groups recently released new research that shows that recreational saltwater fishing has an economic impact that is three times greater than the commercial finfish industry, but often management decisions weigh heavily towards commercial fishing,” said Michael Nussman, President of the American Sportfishing Association. “Recreational anglers want to be held on par with commercial anglers and the new language in the bill to consider the economic impact of all sectors will help balance the scales.” While the House bill differs from the Senate bill in that it does not include provisions to create a national registry of recreational anglers, it addresses concerns with recreational fishing data by authorizing funding to improve the Marine Recreational Fishing Survey Statistics program of the National Marine Fisheries Service. “Improving recreational catch and effort data is a top priority for state fishery managers and anglers,” said Eric Schwaab of the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and co-chair of the Angling 4 Oceans campaign. “We view a system of state-based saltwater fishing licenses, which could take advantage of and build on the existing network of state based fishing license systems, as one pathway to better data. Our ultimate goal is to work with Congress, federal fishery managers and anglers to devise an efficient data collection system that meets our fisheries management needs.” The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership’s Angling 4 Oceans campaign has organized a diverse group of recreational fishing, conservation and industry organizations including the American Fly Fishing Trade Association, American Sportfishing Association, the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Berkley Conservation Institute, The Billfish Foundation, Coastal Conservation Association, Coastside Fishing Club, Izaak Walton League of America, National Marine Manufacturers Association, Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association, Sportfishing Association of California and United Anglers of Southern California. Sportfishing Coalition Lauds Improvements to Fisheries Bill by House Resources Committee WASHINGTON – A coalition of leading recreational angling and conservation organizations welcomed today’s action in the U.S. House of Representatives to advance an update of the country’s most important marine fisheries law. The House Resources Committee voted to send H.R. 5018, the American Fisheries Management and Marine Life Protection Act, to the full House. The action moves efforts to improve the Magnuson-Stevens Act one step closer to completion – more than five years after it was supposed to have been reauthorized. The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership’s (TRCP) Angling 4 Oceans campaign had called for the committee to work together to incorporate issues of importance to recreational anglers into the legislation and move it forward. House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) did just that in working with Ranking Member Nick Rahall (D-WV), Fisheries Subcommittee Chairman Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD) and Representative Jim Saxton (R-NJ) to develop the manager’s amendment that was accepted today. In addition, an amendment accepted by the committee added language that considers the economic impacts of all fishing sectors before making fisheries allocations decisions. “Chairman Pombo understands the importance of healthy, sustainable fisheries for recreational saltwater fishing to grow and thrive,” commented Bob Hayes, General Counsel for the Coastal Conservation Association and co-chair of the Angling 4 Oceans working group. “We worked closely with the chairman to ensure that not only is his bill good for anglers, but also good for fish. We will continue to work with him to get a bill out of the House that can be reconciled with the Senate so that we can enact sound fisheries management policy before time runs out this Congress.” The changes made today by the committee bring the bill closer to including all of priorities of the Angling 4 Oceans groups’ four key SALT principles: Science must be used in marine fisheries conservation; Allocation of fisheries resources should be more equitable to recreational fishermen; Licensing saltwater anglers will improve data collection and increase funding; and Tackle used by fishermen should reduce bycatch and not damage habitat. If provisions are included in the final bill that address these principles, recreational saltwater anglers and marine fisheries will benefit. The bill that was reported out of the House Resources Committee today includes an amendment offered by Representative Jim Saxton (R-NJ) that requires that the economic impacts of recreational fishing and all other sectors be considered when making fisheries allocation decisions. The language, one of the top priorities of TRCP’s Angling 4 Oceans campaign, would change the current process of making allocations based on historical catch records – a process that typically favors commercial fishing. “Our groups recently released new research that shows that recreational saltwater fishing has an economic impact that is three times greater than the commercial finfish industry, but often management decisions weigh heavily towards commercial fishing,” said Michael Nussman, President of the American Sportfishing Association. “Recreational anglers want to be held on par with commercial anglers and the new language in the bill to consider the economic impact of all sectors will help balance the scales.” While the House bill differs from the Senate bill in that it does not include provisions to create a national registry of recreational anglers, it addresses concerns with recreational fishing data by authorizing funding to improve the Marine Recreational Fishing Survey Statistics program of the National Marine Fisheries Service. “Improving recreational catch and effort data is a top priority for state fishery managers and anglers,” said Eric Schwaab of the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and co-chair of the Angling 4 Oceans campaign. “We view a system of state-based saltwater fishing licenses, which could take advantage of and build on the existing network of state based fishing license systems, as one pathway to better data. Our ultimate goal is to work with Congress, federal fishery managers and anglers to devise an efficient data collection system that meets our fisheries management needs.” The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership’s Angling 4 Oceans campaign has organized a diverse group of recreational fishing, conservation and industry organizations including the American Fly Fishing Trade Association, American Sportfishing Association, the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Berkley Conservation Institute, The Billfish Foundation, Coastal Conservation Association, Coastside Fishing Club, Izaak Walton League of America, National Marine Manufacturers Association, Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association, Sportfishing Association of California and United Anglers of Southern California.
Sportfishing Coalition Lauds Improvements to Fisheries Bill by House Resources C
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
Navigation Center Website Survey Request
We are eager to understand the primary reason for your visit to the Navigation Center website and how you use it, whether for recreational boating, professional purposes, data requests, educational reasons, or otherwise. Your feedback on the website’s ease of use, ability to find information, and if it’s your primary source for navigation-related information is crucial. We are committed to improving your experience and welcome any suggestions to enhance the site’s usability, information accessibility, and overall efficiency. Your insights are invaluable in helping us better meet your navigation needs.
Survey: Navigation Center Website Feedback Survey (surveymonkey.com)
U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center Website Customer Feedback Survey Privacy Notice
Authority: 14 U.S.C. §504; 14 U.S.C §505; and Executive Order 12862.
Purpose: To collect data that will be used to analyze and determine the kind and quality of services customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with U.S. Coast Guard Navigation Center services. To maintain confidentiality, respondents are advised not to include any personally identifiable information in their responses.
Routine Uses: This survey solicits information that the Coast Guard will use to gauge feedback and improve overall customer service. DHS/ALL/PIA-069 DHS Surveys, Interviews, and Focus Groups provides coverage for this collection.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is strictly voluntary
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
SCHEDULED/SAN JUAN HARBOR – SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO/ATON/SEC SJ BNM 0011-24
1. THE FOLLOWING AIDS HAVE BEEN TEMPORARILY RELOCATED TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE DREDGE OPERATIONS:
a. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 2 (LLNR 30850) Set at MPP 18-26-46.499N 066-06
-35.544
b. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 3 (LLNR 30855) Set at MPP 18-26-46.472N 066-06
-28.968
c. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 5 (LLNR 30875) Set at MPP 18-26-27.328N 066-06
-28.155
d. Army Terminal Channel Buoy 7 (LLNR 30885) Set at MPP 18-26-05.791N 066-06
-25.774
2. MARINERS ARE RQST TO TRANSIT WITH CAUTION AND MAKE ANY REPORTS TO THE USCG.
CANCEL AT//282310Z MAR 24//
BT
Keep Reading
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (315)
- February 2024 (550)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (6)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (8)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (11)
- September 2017 (8)
- August 2017 (17)
- July 2017 (10)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (3)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (36)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (20)
- June 2016 (17)
- May 2016 (24)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (33)
- February 2016 (37)
- January 2016 (84)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (6)
- January 2014 (5)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (2)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (9)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (8)
- September 2012 (15)
- August 2012 (16)
- July 2012 (15)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (15)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (7)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (14)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (5)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (40)
- March 2008 (30)
- February 2008 (19)
- January 2008 (53)
- December 2007 (15)
- November 2007 (27)
- October 2007 (16)
- September 2007 (28)
- August 2007 (21)
- July 2007 (25)
- June 2007 (28)
- May 2007 (52)
- April 2007 (28)
- March 2007 (38)
- February 2007 (36)
- January 2007 (25)
- December 2006 (50)
- November 2006 (48)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (20)
- August 2006 (36)
- July 2006 (50)
- June 2006 (74)
- May 2006 (70)
- April 2006 (87)
- March 2006 (139)
- February 2006 (94)
- January 2006 (100)
- December 2005 (99)
- November 2005 (70)
- October 2005 (65)
- September 2005 (43)
- August 2005 (41)
- July 2005 (68)
- June 2005 (68)
- May 2005 (52)
- April 2005 (76)
- March 2005 (104)
- February 2005 (97)
- January 2005 (75)
- December 2004 (90)
- November 2004 (67)
- October 2004 (77)
- September 2004 (44)
- August 2004 (66)
- July 2004 (66)
- June 2004 (68)
- May 2004 (87)
- April 2004 (93)
- March 2004 (99)
- February 2004 (101)
- January 2004 (72)
- December 2003 (20)
- November 2003 (11)