Post new topic   Reply to topic

Posts: 12331
Location: Cape Fear, NC
Reply with quote
Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:11 am

A New Attack on The Last Frontier: Alaskan Halibut

July 22, 2013 - How would you like to pay a commercial fisherman for the "opportunity" to fill out your bag limit?

In yet another troubling precedent, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council has approved regulations for pacific halibut that would 1) reduce the recreational allocation of "guided anglers" who fish on charter boats and transfer that quota to the commercial sector, and 2) offer those anglers the "opportunity" to rent those fish back from owners of commercial catch share quotas.

Here's how it would work: first, recreational anglers would be divided into two separate (and unequal) sectors: "guided" and "unguided" angler sectors.

Recreational fishermen who have their own boats would have their allocation taken "off the top" as has always been the case in Alaska. Trawl bycatch and subsistence fishing would also be taken off the top. Whatever is left over would be divided between the commercial longline sector and the new "guided angler" sector.

Charter fishing for halibut in Alaska is already limited to a Guideline Harvest Level (GHL) and a new limited entry program that caps the charter fleet's capacity. The new allocations, called the Catch Sharing Plan (CSP) would further reduce the percentage of halibut landed by guided anglers.

Under most circumstances, the new allocations under the CSP would result in a reduction of the traditional two-fish halibut bag limit by half, or one fish.

But wait! Should an angler on a charter vessel wish to keep a second fish (as allowed for unguided anglers) the charter captain could "rent" the fishing privilege from a commercial fishermen, who would receive a check for that fish at market rates.

In other words, you would have to pay for that fish before you even go fishing!

Take action now against this flagrant resource grab. It's fast and easy when you submit comments on this proposed federal rule online:


"Alaska's fabled reputation as 'the last frontier' takes on a new meaning when we consider the precedent set by the CSP's provisions for renting quota from the commercial sector. If allowed to stand, this assault on the public trust doctrine will spread to other states and anglers can expect many more 'opportunities' to rent fish from commercial fishermen who will receive a check while sipping their morning coffee," said RFA's West Coast Regional Director, Jim Martin.

"The RFA and the Alaska Charter Association have been working side by side for many years to stand against the imposition of catch share systems on the charter fishing industry, and we feel that the recreational fishery must stay united and resist all attempts at sector separation," Martin added.

In 2011, a broad-reaching education campaign conducted by the ACA resulted in over 4,000 public comments on a similar Catch Sharing Plan, a record number of comments in the state of Alaska's history.

"This plan will in effect put me out of business. It will hurt our industry to the point it is unlikely there will be boat launches in Ninilchik or Anchor Point. It will close down our local fish processors," wrote local charter captain Rod Van Saun. "The Catch Share Plan has nothing to do with conservation. It only has to do with allocation. The commercial industry wants to take your fish away and catch and sell them for a profit."

Charter fishing operators, lodges and related businesses are encouraged to join the Alaska Charter Association: membership forms can be found at www.alaskacharter.org. Individual anglers can become associate members of the ACA at no cost. More information about this CSP issue can be found at the website as well as links to provide donations for this battle.

Visit http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2011-0180 and get your comments in before August 12th. Use the sample letter below if you'd like to help craft your own public comment. You can also find a PDF version of the letter which you can date, sign and fax to NOAA by clicking here - right click to save document.

Mr. Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional Administrator

Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region NMFS

P.O. Box 21668

Juneau, AK 99802-1668

FAX: 907-586-7557

Attn: Ellen Sebastian

RE: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0180

Dear Mr. Merrill:

I am writing because I am opposed to the Halibut Catch Sharing Plan (CSP), as proposed by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC).

The only sector that will benefit from this CSP is the commercial sector. Under this plan, the guided sport angler's allocation under the Guideline Harvest Level is given to the commercial sector. This means that in South Central Alaska, the daily bag limit for guided sport anglers will drop to one halibut a day. South East Alaska will suffer more even more restrictions.

Economically, it is not feasible to charter a fishing boat, plus pay for transportation, food, lodging, and entertainment, to try to catch one halibut or one small halibut. Passage of this plan will cause the local economies of towns in Alaska, which are supported by recreational fishing dollars, to suffer.

This plan proposes that a recreational angler, who needs to charter a boat, will be allowed to catch a second halibut by renting a fish from a commercial IFQ holder. This is wrong and will not work.

This CSP will be disastrous to sport anglers, small businesses, and town economies. It will not conserve one fish that is taken from the guided angler because the commercial sector will harvest it instead.

Higher bag limits for unguided anglers versus guided anglers, is a strong incentive to rent a boat without a guide. If the safety issue was of major concern for NOAA in establishing commercial IFQs, why isn't NOAA concerned over the safety of recreational anglers in Alaskan waters?

Thank you for your time and consideration.
Captain Dave Tilley

Let\'s go kill something!
Carolina Beach Fishing Charters
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Posts: 1538
Reply with quote
Wed Jul 24, 2013 3:25 pm
Here are the comments I submitted.

I OPPOSE this Catch Sharing Plan and all other Catch Share schemes. There are better ways to manage our fisheries than by privatizing our public resources. Fishermen should have final approval of any new regulations impacting their fishery with a 2/3 majority vote of participating permit holders. Fishermen should be allowed to offer alternative Fishery Management Plans and vote on them as well.

The RFA could avoid this situation in the South Atlantic by supporting alternatives to Catch Shares in the commercial snapper/grouper fishery. We simply need to align the opening dates for co-occurring species while using appropriate possession limits to avoid multiple extended closures and the resulting regulatory discards. Just saying no to Catch Shares does nothing to solve the problems that have been created to advance the IUCN/NOAA/NMFS/SAFMC/SAFA/EDF agenda.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Posts: 2352
Location: Ocean Isle Beach
Reply with quote
Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:59 pm
Nothing but a step in the direction the progressive liberal want to see all fish stocks go. Who voted for them anyway?  
View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Jump to:   

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum